Surgical Management of Metachronous Liver Metastasis after Watch-and-Wait Strategy in Rectal Cancer Patients with Complete Response: A Case Report

Authors

  • A. Burlaka Department of Surgery, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care of Postgraduate Education of the National Medical University Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • A. Mykytyuk Department of General Surgery, Kyiv City Clinical Hospital No. 1 (Municipal Non-Profit Enterprise), Kyiv, Ukraine
  • V. Bezverkhnyi Military Hospital, Irpin, Ukraine
  • B. Sorokin Shupyk National Healthcare University, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • D. Makhmudov Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department of the National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • V. Skyba Department of Surgery, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care of Postgraduate Education of the National Medical University Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/exp-oncology.2026.01.059

Keywords:

laparoscopic liver resection, rectal cancer, watch-and-wait strategy, clinical complete response, metachro- nous liver metastasis, anatomical segment 4b resection

Abstract

The watch-and-wait (W&W) strategy has become an accepted organ-preserving approach for rectal cancer patients who achieve a clinical complete response (cCR) after total neoadjuvant therapy (tNt). however, the occurrence of metachronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in this setting presents important therapeutic challenges. Evidence regarding the optimal surgical strategy—particularly the role of laparoscopic anatomical resection in centrally located liver segments—remains limited. We report the case of a 54-year-old male with ct3N0M0 rectal adenocarcinoma who achieved cCR following tNt and was subsequently managed with a W&W strategy. During routine surveillance, a soli- tary metachronous liver metastasis (15 mm) was detected in segment 4b. After a multidisciplinary tumor board review, the patient underwent laparoscopic anatomical segment 4b resection using an intrahepatic Glissonean approach. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 6. histopathological exami- nation confirmed metastatic moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma with a microsatellite stable (MSS) phenotype and KRAS/BRAF wild-type status. This case demonstrates that laparoscopic anatomical segment 4b resection is a safe and feasible option for carefully selected patients with metachronous CRLM managed within a W&W strategy. The minimally invasive anatomical approach allowed precise vascular control and achievement of oncologically adequate margins in a technically demanding central segment. Larger clinical series are needed to define optimal management strategies and long-term oncologic outcomes in this setting.

References

Van der Valk MJM, Hilling DE, Bastiaannet E, et al. Long-term outcomes of clinical complete responders after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD): an international multicentre registry study. Lancet. 2018;391:2537-2545. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31078-X

Aeberhard P, Fasolini F. Total mesorectal excision for cancer of the rectum. In: Schlag PM, ed. Rectal cancer. Recent results in cancer research. Vol 146. Berlin: Springer; 1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71967-7_6

Lee SH. Total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: evidence and challenge. Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39:301-306. https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00269.0038

Yuval JB, Garcia-Aguilar J. Watch-and-wait management for rectal cancer after clinical complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. Adv Surg. 2021;55:89-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yasu.2021.05.007

Verheij FS, Omer DM, Williams H, et al. Long-term results of organ preservation in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with total neoadjuvant therapy: the randomized phase II OPRA trial. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42:500-506. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.01208

Park IJ. Non-operative management of locally advanced rectal cancer with an emphasis on outcomes and quality of life: a narrative review. Ewha Med J. 2025;48:e40. https://doi.org/10.12771/emj.2025.00703

Fernandez LM, São Julião GP, Renehan AG, et al. The risk of distant metastases in patients with clinical complete response managed by watch and wait after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: the influence of local regrowth in the International Watch & Wait Database. Dis Colon Rectum. 2023;66:41-49. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000002494

Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2224-2229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09290-5

Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, et al. The Southampton consensus guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: from indication to implementation. Ann Surg. 2018;268:11-18. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002524

Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, et al. A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21:745-753. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.166

Pilz da Cunha G, Hoogteijling TJ, Besselink MG, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Int J Surg. 2025;111:5549-5571. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002567

Liu Y, Zhang J, Chen K. Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: updated evidence of safety and oncological equivalence. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28:5275-5288. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i36.5275

Yuval JB, Thompson HM, Garcia-Aguilar J. Organ preservation in rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24:1880-1888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04583-w

Turri G, Ostuzzi G, Vita G, et al. Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer in the era of total neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7:e2414702. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14702

Kim JH, Kim H. Pure laparoscopic anatomical resection of segment 4b for hepatocellular carcinoma using the transfissural Glissonean approach. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24:2393-2394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04637-z

Yamamoto M, Ariizumi S. Glissonean pedicle approach in liver surgery. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2018;2:124-128. https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12062

Pinto F, Pangrazio MD, Martinino A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis: an umbrella review. Front Oncol. 2024;14:1340430. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1340430

Xie SM, Xiong JJ, Liu XT, et al. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1012. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00978-z

Igarashi Y, Haruki K, Furukawa K, et al. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection in the elderly: a propensity score-matched analysis. Anticancer Res. 2024;44:2731-2736. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17081

Ivanecz A, Plahuta I, Mencinger M, et al. The learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection utilising a difficulty score. Radiol Oncol. 2021;56:111-118. https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2021-0035

Downloads

Published

14.06.2026

How to Cite

Burlaka, A., Mykytyuk, A., Bezverkhnyi, V., Sorokin, B., Makhmudov, D., & Skyba, V. (2026). Surgical Management of Metachronous Liver Metastasis after Watch-and-Wait Strategy in Rectal Cancer Patients with Complete Response: A Case Report. Experimental Oncology, 48(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.15407/exp-oncology.2026.01.059