SOMATIC GENE VARIANTS IN NONRESECTABLE CUTANEOUS MELANOMA CELLS AND PHARMACOGENOMIC MARKERS DETECTION: INFLUENCE ON STRATEGY OF EFFECTIVE CANCER TREATMENT
Keywords:
NGS, clinical relevance, gene variants, melanoma, pharmacogenomic markers, effective cancer treatment, targeted therapy, personalized medicineAbstract
The study aimed to identify clinically relevant gene variants in non-resectable cutaneous melanoma samples from Ukrainian patients and to investigate some pharmacogenomic markers using NGS technology to inform cancer treatment strategies. Methods. The study used 30 samples of Ukrainian patients aged 28-76 years, who had nonresectable cutaneous melanomas of various localizations and degrees of differentiation. Ion Torrent NGS technology of targeted gene sequencing (Custom AmpliSeq™ Cancer Hotspot and Pharmacogenomic panels) was used to identify genetic alterations, which were classified by the Franklin by Gennox database and custom pharmacogenomic Ion Reporter Software pipeline. Results. A total of 148 different gene alterations were identified in 40 genes (SNVs, MNVs, INDELs) by the Cancer Hotspot Panel, revealing mutation patterns consistent with international data. However, notable discrepancies exist, such as a high KRAS mutation rate (29.3%), predominantly in stage III tumors, suggesting a role in tumor aggression and progression. We identified frequent TP53 and BRAF mutations, with BRAF V600E being the most common, and observed a higher prevalence of BRAF mutations in females. TP53 mutations are prevalent (59.3%) and vary with age and sex, though their prognostic significance requires further validation. A second key novel finding was the detection of FLT3 mutations in 22.2% of samples, with a statistically significantly higher prevalence in Stage IV disease, suggesting a potential role for FLT3 in melanoma progression and warranting further investigation as a prognostic biomarker and a potential target for existing FLT3 inhibitors. Ultimately, our pilot analysis of pharmacogenomic markers underscores their potential clinical utility in informing personalized treatment decisions. For instance, the identification of a patient with the rs35599367 (G/A) risk allele for adverse drug reactions underscores the value of using pharmacogenetic data to inform the selection between approved therapies. Conclusions. This study reveals unique mutational patterns in the Ukrainian patient cohort, emphasizing the importance of population-specific research to uncover new therapeutic targets and refine personalized treatment strategies. The data suggest that there may be potential for implementing a method of determining both tumor-associated mutations and pharmacogenetic markers of the patient, to facilitate more effective patient treatment. Further validation on a larger number of samples, as well as more exhaustive analysis employing alternative methods, is necessary to substantiate these findings.
References
Lopes J, Rodrigues CMP, Gaspar MM, et al. Melanoma management: from epidemiology to treatment and latest advances. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(19):4652. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14194652
Druskovich C, Kelley J, Aubrey J, et al. A review of melanoma subtypes: genetic and treatment considerations. J Surg Oncol. 2025;131(3):356-364. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27953
Castellani G, Buccarelli M, Arasi MB, et al. BRAF mutations in melanoma: biological aspects, therapeutic implications, and circulating biomarkers. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(16):4026. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15164026
Florent L, Saby C, Slimano F,et al. BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma and targeted therapy resistance: an update of the current knowledge. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(9):2607. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15092607
Membrive Jiménez C, Pérez Ramírez C, Sánchez Martín A, et al. Clinical application of pharmacogenetic markers in the treatment of dermatologic pathologies. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021;14(9):905. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14090905
Truesdell P, Chang J, Coto Villa D, et al. Pharmacogenomic discovery of genetically targeted cancer therapies optimized against clinical outcomes. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024;8(1):186. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-024-00673-z
Cui X, Song J, Li Q, Ren J. Identification of biomarkers and target drugs for melanoma: a topological and deep learning approach. Front Genet. 2025;16:1471037. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2025.1471037
Gerashchenko G, Gulkovskyi R, Melnichuk N, et al. Identification of clinically relevant gene variants in colon adenocarcinoma samples of Ukrainian patients using a comprehensive cancer panel: a pilot study. Exp Oncol. 2024;46(3):221-227. https://doi.org/10.15407/exp-oncology.2024.03.221
Amendola LM, Jarvik GP, Leo MC, et al. Performance of ACMG-AMP variant-interpretation guidelines among nine laboratories in the clinical sequencing exploratory research consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98(6):1067-1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.024
Nykamp K, Anderson M, Powers M, et al. Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria. Genet Med. 2017;19(10):1105-1117. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.37
Mandelker D, Donoghue M, Talukdar S, et al. Germline-focussed analysis of tumour-only sequencing: recommendations from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(8):1221-1231. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz136
Whirl-Carrillo M, Huddart R, Gong L, et al. An evidence-based framework for evaluating pharmacogenomics knowledge for personalized medicine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021;110(3):563-572. https://doi.org10.1002/cpt.2350
Lewis BC, Korprasertthaworn P, Miners JO. Impaired dacarbazine activation and 7-ethoxyresorufin deethylation in vitro by polymorphic variants of CYP1A1 and CYP1A2: implications for cancer therapy. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2016;26(10):453-61. https://doi.org10.1097/FPC.0000000000000236
Goey AK, With M, Agema BC, et al. Effects of pharmacogenetic variants on vemurafenib-related toxicities in patients with melanoma. Pharmacogenomics. 2019;20(18):1283-1290. https://doi.org10.2217/pgs-2019-0101
Casula M, Paliogiannis P, Ayala F, et al. Germline and somatic mutations in patients with multiple primary melanomas: a next generation sequencing study. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):772. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5984-7
Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Genomic classification of cutaneous melanoma. Cell. 2015;161(7):1681-1696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.044
Jia DD, Li T. Comprehensive insights on genetic alterations and immunotherapy prognosis in Chinese melanoma patients. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):16607. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65065-6
Reddy BY, Miller DM, Tsao H. Somatic driver mutations in melanoma. Cancer. 2017;123(S11):2104-2117. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30593
Cai Y, Ke L, Zhang W, et al. Recurrent KRAS, KIT and SF3B1 mutations in melanoma of the female genital tract. BMC Cancer. 2021;21:677. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08427-x
Cook J, Melloni G, Gulhan D, et al. The origins and genetic interactions of KRAS mutations are allele- and tissue-specific. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1808. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22125-z
Tímár J, Kashofer K. Molecular epidemiology and diagnostics of KRAS mutations in human cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2020;39:1029-1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-020-09915-5
Zhou Y, Kuang Y, Wang C, et al. Impact of KRAS mutation on the tumor microenvironment in colorectal cancer. Int J Biol Sci. 2024;20:1947-1964. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.88779
Thierauf J, Kaluziak S, Codd E, et al. Prognostic biomarkers for survival in mucosal melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2023;36:378-387. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcmr.13104
Rabbie R, Ferguson P, Wong K, et al. The mutational landscape of melanoma brain metastases presenting as the first visceral site of recurrence. Br J Cancer. 2020;124:156-160. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-01090-2
Zhang W, Flemington E, Zhang K. Mutant TP53 disrupts age-related accumulation patterns of somatic mutations in multiple cancer types. Cancer Genet. 2016;209(9):376-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2016.07.001
Kim D, Haydu L, Joon A, et al. Clinicopathological features and clinical outcomes associated with TP53 and BRAFnon-V600 mutations in cutaneous melanoma patients. Cancer. 2017;123(8):1372–1381. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30463
Cardano M, Buscemi G, Zannini L. Sex disparities in P53 regulation and functions: novel insights for personalized cancer therapies. Cells. 2025;14(5), 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14050363
Meevassana J, Mittrakulkij C, Toworrakul P, et al. Evaluation of P53 immunostaining in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Biomed Rep. 2023; 20(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2023.1696
Xiao W, Du N, Huang T, et al. TP53 mutation as potential negative predictor for response of anti-CTLA-4 therapy in metastatic melanoma. EBioMedicine. 2018;32:119-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.05.019
Castellani G, Buccarelli M, Arasi M, et al. BRAF mutations in melanoma: biological aspects, therapeutic implications, and circulating biomarkers. Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(16):4026. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15164026
Kim S, Kim S, Hahn H, et al. Meta-analysis of BRAF mutations and clinicopathologic characteristics in primary melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(6):1036-1046.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.02.1113
Shee K, Chambers M, Hughes E, et al. Molecular genetic profiling reveals novel association between FLT3 mutation and survival in glioma. J Neurooncol. 2020;148:473-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03567-9
Zhang R, Bozic I. Accumulation of oncogenic mutations during progression from healthy tissue to cancer. Bull Math Biol. 2024; 86(12):142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-024-01372-3
Li G, Zhang J, Liu Y, et al. Analyzing prognostic hub genes in the microenvironment of cutaneous melanoma by computer integrated bioinformatics. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022; 2022:4493347. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4493347
Chen R, Wang X, Fu J, et al. High FLT3 expression indicates favorable prognosis and correlates with clinicopathological parameters and immune infiltration in breast cancer. Front Genet. 2022; 13:956869. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.956869
Pflugfelder A, Eigentler T, Keim U, et al. Effectiveness of carboplatin and paclitaxel as first- and second-line treatment in 61 patients with metastatic melanoma. PLoS One. 2011; 6(2):e16882. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016882
Lee C, Jung M, Choi H, et al. Results of a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of docetaxel and carboplatin in metastatic malignant melanoma patients who failed first-line therapy containing dacarbazine. Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47:781-789. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.261
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Experimental Oncology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
