RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION AS PART OF INTRAHEPATIC TREATMENT STRATEGIES

Authors

  • K. Valikhnovska State Non-commercial Enterprise “National Cancer Institute”, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • A. Lukashenko State Non-commercial Enterprise “National Cancer Institute”, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/exp-oncology.2025.03.361

Keywords:

colorectal cancer, liver resection, colorectal liver metastases, electrosurgery, radiofrequency ablation

Abstract

Background. Liver resection remains a gold standard for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases; however, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may serve as an alternative for patients with contraindications to resection or within parenchymasparing strategies. The aim of this study was to analyze treatment outcomes, prognostic factors, and survival after RFA of intraparenchymal colorectal liver metastases. Materials and Methods. A retrospective analysis was performed on 33 patients with colorectal liver metastases who underwent RFA between 2013 and 2023. The ablation was carried out using the Cool-tip RF Ablation System E Series (Covidien) with a maximum output power of 200 W and internally cooled monopolar needles with a 3 cm active tip, under intraoperative ultrasound guidance. Results. Patients were stratified according to survival status. Group 1 (n = 23) included patients who underwent RFA and were alive at the time of analysis; Group 2 (n = 10) included those who died of disease progression. The survival was significantly influenced by the presence of synchronous metastases (21.7% vs 100.0%, p < 0.001), metachronous metastases (78.3% vs 0, p < 0.001), and median time to progression (18 (78.3%) vs 1 (10.0%), p = 0.0004). No significant effect was found for sex, age, primary tumor localization or morphology, number of chemotherapy lines before ablation, maximal size and number of metastases, type of surgery for the primary tumor, or the presence of comorbidities. Conclusion. RFA in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases is a safe alternative for the unresectable lesions or within parenchyma-sparing strategies. However, liver resection should be considered a priority option when technically feasible. Combining resection and RFA expands the range of patients eligible for radical intervention, potentially improving disease-free and overall survival rates. These findings are limited by baseline group disparities. Randomized or propensity-matched studies are needed to confirm RFA efficacy and define the target population most likely to benefit.

References

Bray f, ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492

Väyrynen V, Wirta EV. Seppälä T, et al. Incidence and management of patients with colorectal cancer and synchro-nous and metachronous colorectal metastases: a population-based study. BJS Open. 2020;4(4):685-692. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50299

hedrick TL, Zaydfudim VM. Management of synchronous colorectal cancer metastases. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2022;31(2):265-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soc.2021.11.007

Van Cutsem E, Nordlinger B, Adam R, et al. Towards a pan-European consensus on the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(14):2212-2221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2006.04.012

Engstrand J, Nilsson h, Strömberg C, et al. Colorectal cancer liver metastases — a population-based study on incidence, management and survival. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3925-x

Lintoiu-Ursut B, Tulin A, Constantinoiu S. Recurrence after hepatic resection in colorectal cancer liver metastasis. J Med Life. 2015;8(Spec issue):12-14.

Kanas GP, Taylor A, Primrose JN, et al. Survival after liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors. Clin Epidemiol. 2012;4:283-301. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S34285

Tian y, Wang y, Wen N, et al. Prognostic factors associated with early recurrence following liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2024;24:426. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s12885-024-12162-4

Brandi G, de Lorenzo S, Nannini M, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colorectal cancer metastases: literature review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(2):519-533. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.519

Puijk RS, Ruarus Ah, Vroomen LGPh, …COLLISION Trial Group. Colorectal liver metastases: surgery versus thermal ablation (COLLISION) — a phase III single-blind prospective randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):821. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s12885-018-4716-8

Solbiati L, Ierace T, Goldberg SN, et al. Percutaneous US-guided radio-frequency tissue ablation of liver metastases: treatment and follow-up in 16 patients. Radiology. 1997;202(1):195-203. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology. 202.1.8988211

Ringe KI, Lutat C, Rieder C, et al. Experimental evaluation of the heat sink effect in hepatic microwave ablation.

PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0134301. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134301

de Vita E, de Tommasi f, Massaroni C, et al. Investigation of the heat sink effect during microwave ablation in hepatic tissue: experimental and numerical analysis. IEEE Sensors J. 2021;21(20):22743-22751. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.3107220

Wood Tf, Rose dM, Chung M, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of 231 unresectable hepatic tumors: indications, limitations, and complications. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7(8):593-600. https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf02725339

Tanabe KK, Curley SA, dodd Gd, et al. Radiofrequency ablation: the experts weigh in. Cancer. 2004;100(3):641–650. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11919

Shady W, Petre EN, Gonen M. Long-term outcomes following percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for colorectal liver metastases: a 10-year experience. Eur Radiol. 2023;33(4):2561-2571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09288-5

Nijkamp MW, van Tilborg AAJM, Meijerink MR. Local ablation for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological outcomes compared with resection. HPB (Oxford). 2022;24(6):873-884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2022.02.007

Shady W, Gonen M, Brown KT. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases: safety, ef- fi acy, and prognostic factors. J Vascul Intervent Radiol. 2020;31(3):552-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2019.11.023

Shindoh J, Kobayashi y, Kawamura y. Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases improves salvageability and survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(4):2113-2122. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09377-0

Yin Z, Liu C, Chen Y. Prognostic differences between synchronous and metachronous colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):151. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09241-0

Zheng J, Seier K, Gonen M. Prognostic factors for survival after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases: a long-term follow-up study. Front Oncol. 2021;11:643103. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.643103

Ruers T, Van Coevorden f, Punt CJA. Local treatment of unresectable colorectal liver metastases: results of a randomized phase II trial (EORTC 40004 CLOCC). Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(10):1221-1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30469-1

Bertens KA, demirjian A, driedger M. Integration of ablation therapy into multimodality treatment of colorectal liver metastases: current evidence and future perspectives. HPB (Oxford). 2020;22(8):1105-1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.11.004

Downloads

Published

30.12.2025

How to Cite

Valikhnovska, K., & Lukashenko, A. (2025). RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION AS PART OF INTRAHEPATIC TREATMENT STRATEGIES. Experimental Oncology, 47(3), 361–368. https://doi.org/10.15407/exp-oncology.2025.03.361

Issue

Section

Original contributions