SOMATIC GENE VARIANTS IN UNRESECTABLE CUTANEOUS MELANOMA CELLS AND DETECTION OF PHARMACOGENOMIC MARKERS: INFLUENCE ON STRATEGY OF EFFECTIVE CANCER TREATMENT

Authors

  • R. Gulkovskyi Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • G. Gerashchenko Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • A. Bezverkhiy Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • N. Melnichuk Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • O. Mankovska Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • T. Marchyshak Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • H. Karaman Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • M. Krotevych Research Department of the Pathological Anatomy, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • S. Trokhymych Research Department of the Pathological Anatomy, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • O. Ruban Research Department of the Pathological Anatomy, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Z. Tkachuk Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • M. Tukalo Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • V. Kashuba Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/exp-oncology.2025.03.288

Keywords:

NGS, clinical relevance, gene variants, melanoma, pharmacogenomic markers, effective cancer treatment

Abstract

The study aimed to identify the clinically relevant gene variants in unresectable cutaneous melanoma samples from Ukrainian patients using NGS technology and to investigate some pharmacogenomic markers useful for the development of cancer treat- ment strategies. Materials and Methods. 30 samples of unresectable cutaneous melanomas of various localizations and differen- tiation grades were analyzed. The Ion Torrent NGS technology of targeted gene sequencing (Custom AmpliSeq™ Cancer hotspot and Pharmacogenomic panels) was applied to identify the genetic alterations, which were classifi d using franklin by Gennox database and custom pharmacogenomic Ion Reporter Software pipeline. Results. A total of 148 different gene alterations were identifi d in 40 genes (SNVs, MNVs, INdELs) by the Cancer hotspot Panel, revealing the mutation patterns consistent with the international data. however, notable discrepancies exist, such as a high KRAS mutation rate (29.3%), predominantly in stage III tumors, suggesting their role in tumor aggressiveness and progression. We identifi d the frequent TP53 and BRAF mutations, with BRAF V600E being the most common, and observed a higher prevalence of BRAF mutations in females. TP53 mutations were prevalent (59.3%) and varied with age and sex, though their prognostic signifi ance requires further validation. A second key novel fi ding was the detection of FLT3 mutations in 22.2% of the samples, with a signifi antly higher prevalence in stage IV disease, suggesting a potential role of FLT3 in melanoma progression and warranting further investigation as a prognostic biomarker and a potential target for the existing FLT3 inhibitors. Ultimately, our pilot analysis of pharmacogenomic markers un- derscored their potential clinical utility in choosing personalized treatment decisions. for instance, the identifi ation of a patient with the rs35599367 (G/A) risk allele for adverse drug reactions underscores the value of using pharmacogenetic data to make a correct selection between approved therapies. Conclusions. Our study presents the fi st comprehensive analysis of somatic mutations and pharmacogenomic markers in unresectable cutaneous melanoma tissue samples from Ukrainian patients. We found that while common somatic variants generally align with global trends, the mutational landscape in this cohort presents several unique features: a high KRAS mutation rate and its apparent stage-specifi prevalence, and a high FLT3 mutation rate, predominantly in stage IV tumors. further validation on a larger number of samples, as well as more exhaustive analysis employ- ing alternative methods, is necessary to substantiate these fi dings and to facilitate more effective melanoma treatment.

References

Lopes J, Rodrigues CMP, Gaspar MM, et al. Melanoma management: from epidemiology to treatment and latest advances. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(19):4652. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14194652

fedorenko ZP, Goulak LO, Gorokh yeL, et al. Cancer in Ukraine 20220-2023: incidence, mortality, prevalence and other relevant statistics. Bull Nat Cancer Reg Ukraine 2024;25. Available at http://www.ncru.inf.ua/publications/ BULL_23/index_e.htm

ISSN 1812-9269. Experimental Oncology 47 (3). 2025 299

druskovich C, Kelley J, Aubrey J, et al. A review of melanoma subtypes: genetic and treatment considerations. J Surg Oncol. 2025;131(3):356-364. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27953

Castellani G, Buccarelli M, Arasi MB, et al. BRAf mutations in melanoma: biological aspects, therapeutic impli- cations, and circulating biomarkers. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(16):4026. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15164026

florent L, Saby C, Slimano f,et al. BRAf V600-mutated metastatic melanoma and targeted therapy resistance: an update of the current knowledge. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(9):2607. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15092607

Membrive Jiménez C, Pérez Ramírez C, Sánchez Martín A, et al. Clinical application of pharmacogenetic markers in the treatment of dermatologic pathologies. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021;14(9):905. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14090905

Truesdell P, Chang J, Coto Villa d, et al. Pharmacogenomic discovery of genetically targeted cancer therapies op- timized against clinical outcomes. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024;8(1):186. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-024-00673-z

Cui X, Song J, Li Q, Ren J. Identification of biomarkers and target drugs for melanoma: a topological and deep learning approach. Front Genet. 2025;16:1471037. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2025.1471037

Gerashchenko G, Gulkovskyi R, Melnichuk N, et al. Identification of clinically relevant gene variants in colon adenocarcinoma samples of Ukrainian patients using a comprehensive cancer panel: a pilot study. Exp Oncol. 2024;46(3):221-227. https://doi.org/10.15407/exp-oncology.2024.03.221

Amendola LM, Jarvik GP, Leo MC, et al. Performance of ACMG-AMP variant-interpretation guidelines among nine laboratories in the clinical sequencing exploratory research consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98(6):1067- 1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.024

Nykamp K, Anderson M, Powers M, et al. Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant clas- sification criteria. Genet Med. 2017;19(10):1105-1117. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.37

Mandelker d, donoghue M, Talukdar S, et al. Germline-focussed analysis of tumour-only sequencing: recom- mendations from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(8):1221-1231. https://doi. org/10.1093/annonc/mdz136

Whirl-Carrillo M, huddart R, Gong L, et al. An evidence-based framework for evaluating pharmacogenomics knowledge for personalized medicine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021;110(3):563-572. https://doi.org10.1002/cpt.2350

Lewis BC, Korprasertthaworn P, Miners JO. Impaired dacarbazine activation and 7-ethoxyresorufin deethylation in vitro by polymorphic variants of CyP1A1 and CyP1A2: implications for cancer therapy. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2016;26(10):453-61. https://doi.org10.1097/fPC.0000000000000236

Goey AK, With M, Agema BC, et al. Effects of pharmacogenetic variants on vemurafenib-related toxicities in pa- tients with melanoma. Pharmacogenomics. 2019;20(18):1283-1290. https://doi.org10.2217/pgs-2019-0101

Casula M, Paliogiannis P, Ayala f, et al. Germline and somatic mutations in patients with multiple primary melano- mas: a next generation sequencing study. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):772. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5984-7

Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Genomic classification of cutaneous melanoma. Cell. 2015;161(7):1681-1696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.044

Jia dd, Li T. Comprehensive insights on genetic alterations and immunotherapy prognosis in Chinese melanoma patients. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):16607. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65065-6

Reddy By, Miller dM, Tsao h. Somatic driver mutations in melanoma. Cancer. 2017;123(S11):2104-2117. https:// doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30593

Cai y, Ke L, Zhang W, et al. Recurrent KRAS, KIT and Sf3B1 mutations in melanoma of the female genital tract.

BMC Cancer. 2021;21:677. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08427-x

Cook J, Melloni G, Gulhan d, et al. The origins and genetic interactions of KRAS mutations are allele- and tissue- specific. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1808. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22125-z

Tímár J, Kashofer K. Molecular epidemiology and diagnostics of KRAS mutations in human cancer. Cancer Metas- tasis Rev. 2020;39:1029-1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-020-09915-5

Zhou y, Kuang y, Wang C, et al. Impact of KRAS mutation on the tumor microenvironment in colorectal cancer.

Int J Biol Sci. 2024;20:1947-1964. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.88779

Thierauf J, Kaluziak S, Codd E, et al. Prognostic biomarkers for survival in mucosal melanoma. Pigment Cell Mela- noma Res. 2023;36:378-387. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcmr.13104

Rabbie R, ferguson P, Wong K, et al. The mutational landscape of melanoma brain metastases presenting as the first visceral site of recurrence. Br J Cancer. 2020;124:156-160. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-01090-2

Zhang W, flemington E, Zhang K. Mutant TP53 disrupts age-related accumulation patterns of somatic mutations in multiple cancer types. Cancer Genet. 2016;209(9):376-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2016.07.001

Kim d, haydu L, Joon A, et al. Clinicopathological features and clinical outcomes associated with TP53 and BRAFnon-V600

mutations in cutaneous melanoma patients. Cancer. 2017;123(8):1372–1381. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30463

Cardano M, Buscemi G, Zannini L. Sex disparities in P53 regulation and functions: novel insights for personalized cancer therapies. Cells. 2025;14(5):363. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14050363

Meevassana J, Mittrakulkij C, Toworrakul P, et al. Evaluation of P53 immunostaining in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Biomed Rep. 2023; 20(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2023.1696

Xiao W, du N, huang T, et al. TP53 mutation as potential negative predictor for response of anti-CTLA-4 therapy in metastatic melanoma. EBioMedicine. 2018;32:119-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.05.019

ISSN 1812-9269. Experimental Oncology 47 (3). 2025

Castellani G, Buccarelli M, Arasi M, et al. BRAf mutations in melanoma: biological aspects, therapeutic implica- tions, and circulating biomarkers. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(16):4026. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15164026

Kim S, Kim S, hahn h, et al. Meta-analysis of BRAf mutations and clinicopathologic characteristics in primary melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(6):1036-1046.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.02.1113

Shee K, Chambers M, hughes E, et al. Molecular genetic profiling reveals novel association between fLT3 mutation and survival in glioma. J Neurooncol. 2020;148:473-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03567-9

Zhang R, Bozic I. Accumulation of oncogenic mutations during progression from healthy tissue to cancer. Bull Math Biol. 2024;86(12):142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-024-01372-3

Li G, Zhang J, Liu y, et al. Analyzing prognostic hub genes in the microenvironment of cutaneous melanoma by com- puter integrated bioinformatics. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022;2022:4493347. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4493347

Chen R, Wang X, fu J, et al. high fLT3 expression indicates favorable prognosis and correlates with clinicopatho- logical parameters and immune infiltration in breast cancer. Front Genet. 2022;13:956869. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fgene.2022.956869

Pflugfelder A, Eigentler T, Keim U, et al. Effectiveness of carboplatin and paclitaxel as fi st- and second-line treatment in 61 patients with metastatic melanoma. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e16882. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016882

Lee C, Jung M, Choi h, et al. Results of a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of docetaxel and carboplatin in metastatic malignant melanoma patients who failed first-line therapy containing dacarbazine. Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47:781-789. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.261

Downloads

Published

30.12.2025

How to Cite

Gulkovskyi, R., Gerashchenko, G., Bezverkhiy, A., Melnichuk, N., Mankovska, O., Marchyshak, T., … Kashuba, V. (2025). SOMATIC GENE VARIANTS IN UNRESECTABLE CUTANEOUS MELANOMA CELLS AND DETECTION OF PHARMACOGENOMIC MARKERS: INFLUENCE ON STRATEGY OF EFFECTIVE CANCER TREATMENT. Experimental Oncology, 47(3), 288–301. https://doi.org/10.15407/exp-oncology.2025.03.288

Issue

Section

Original contributions