Plasma ctDNA RAS status selects patients for anti-EGFR treatment rechallenge in metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32471/exp-oncology.2312-8852.vol-43-no-3.16592Keywords:
antiEGFR, BRAF, cetuximab, circulating tumor DNA, KRAS, NRAS, panitumumabAbstract
Summary. Background: Recently one randomized trial and several phase II studies underscored that patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed after an initial clinical benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment may further benefit from rechallenge with anti-EGFR therapy. Testing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) RAS status prior to anti-EGFR rechallenge seems a promising non-invasive method to predict and monitor response to anti-EGFR readministration. Aim: To assess the capability of liquid biopsy ctDNA in exploring RAS status and in predicting outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody rechallenge. Materials and Methods: Systematic review of literature and meta-analysis of the available evidence. Results: Data from four studies involving 117 patients were available. All patients harbored RAS wild type tumors and derived benefit from first line anti-EGFR therapy. Of these, 65 underwent plasma ctDNA before anti-EGFR treatment rechallenge and were eligible for analyses: 35 patients had RAS wild type ctDNA, and 30 RAS mutated, indicating that 46% of patients underwent RAS status conversion after primary anti-EGFR therapy. Anti-EGFR rechallenge among patients with plasma ctDNA RAS wild type status was associated with a consistent benefit in progression free survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22–0.70; p = 0.001; I2 = 0) and overall survival (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16–0.85; p = 0.02; I2 = 74%) when compared to its use among patients with plasma ctDNA RAS mutation. Patients with plasma ctDNA RAS wild type profile also performed statistically better in term of disease control rate, risk for disease progression at 3 and 6 months, and risk for death at 6 and 12 months. Conclusion: RAS status assessment continues to be useful in predicting benefit for anti-EGFR treatment.
References
Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Hartmann JT, et al. Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the OPUS study. Ann Oncol 2011; 22: 1535–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdq632
Mauri G, Pizzutilo EG, Amatu A, et al. Retreatment with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer: Systematic review of different strategies. Cancer Treat Rev 2019; 73: 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.12.006.
Cremolini C, Rossini D, Dell’Aquila E, et al. Rechallenge for patients with RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer with acquired resistance to first-line cetuximab and irinotecan: A phase 2 single-arm clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2019; 5: 343–50. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5080.
Venkatesan S, Swanton C, Taylor BS, Costello JF. Treatment-induced mutagenesis and selective pressures sculpt cancer evolution. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2017; 7. pii: a026617. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a026617.
Parseghian CM, Napolitano S, Loree JM, Kopetz S. Mechanisms of innate and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy: a review of current knowledge with a focus on rechallenge therapies. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25: 6899–908. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0823.
Osumi H, Shinozaki E, Yamaguchi K, Zembutsu H. Clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA for colorectal cancer. Cancer Sci 2019; 110: 1148–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.13972.
Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med 1998; 17: 2815–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19981230) 17:24<2815::aid-sim110>3.0.co;2-8.
Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, et al. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials 2007; 8: 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-16.
Guyot, P, Ades AE, Ouwens MJ, Welton NJ. Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan–Meier survival curves. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012; 12: 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-9.
Cai Z, Fan X. A comparison of fixed-effects and random-effects models for multivariate meta-analysis using an SEM approach. Multivariate Behav Res 2019; 15: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1689348.
Rossini D, Cremolini C, Conca E, et al. Liquid biopsy to predict benefit from rechallenge with cetuximab + irinotecan in RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients with acquired resistance to first-line cetuximab +irinotecan: Final results and translational analyses of the CRICKET study by GONO Poster presented at: ESMO 20th World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer 20-23 June 2018 Barcelona https://www.postersessiononline.eu/173580348_eu/congresos/20wcgic/aula/-O_7_20wcgic.pdf
Tsuji A, Eto T, Masuishi T, et al. Phase II study of third-line cetuximab rechallenge in patients with metastatic wild-type K-RAS colorectal cancer who achieved a clinical benefit in response to first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy (JACCRO-08). Ann Oncol 2016; 27: 510.
Tsuji A, Nakamura M, Watanabe T, et al. Phase II study of third-line panitumumab rechallenge in patients with metastatic wild-type KRAS colorectal cancer who achieved a clinical benefit in response to first-line panitumumab plus chemotherapy. (JACCRO-09) Ann Oncol 2018; 29: v68–9.
Osawa H, Shinozaki E, Nakamura M, et al. Phase II study of cetuximab rechallenge in patients with ras wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: E-rechallenge trial. Ann Oncol 2018; 29: viii161. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ 6f05/21b7dbecd15954b5c64011a1163a9e36e822.pdf.
Sunakawa Y, Nakamura M, Ishizaki M, et al. RAS mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and clinical outcomes of rechallenge treatments with anti-EGFR antibodies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Ann Oncol 2019; 30: iv114. https://www.sysmex-europe.com/fileadmin/media/f100/Poster/Life_Science/ ESMO2019/JACCRO_CC-0809AR_ESMO-GI2019_poster_submit.pdf.
Diaz LA Jr, Williams RT, Wu J, et al. The molecular evolution of acquired resistance to targeted EGFR blockade in colorectal cancers. Nature 2012; 486: 537–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11219.
Morelli MP, Overman MJ, Dasari A, et al. Characterizing the patterns of clonal selection in circulating tumor DNA from patients with colorectal cancer refractory to anti-EGFR treatment. Ann Oncol 2015; 26: 731–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv005.
Siravegna G, Baredelli A. Failure is not final: ctDNA-guided rechallenge therapy in colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2019; 30: 157–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy525.
Stewart LA, Parmar MK. Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? Lancet 1993; 341: 418–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(93)93004-k.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Experimental Oncology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
