Experimental substantiation of the use of hydroxyapatite — tricalcium phosphate bioceramics for replacing bone defects after tumor removal

Authors

  • V.F. Konovalenko R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology
  • N.K. Ternovyi R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology
  • E.V. Tuz R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology
  • V.V. Protsenko SI Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics of the NAMSU, Kyiv 01601, Ukraine
  • E.O. Solonitsyn SI Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics of the NAMSU, Kyiv 01601, Ukraine
  • A. Audai SI Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics of the NAMSU, Kyiv 01601, Ukraine
  • O.V. Drobotun Kyiv City Clinical Hospital No.3, Kyiv 02125, Ukraine
  • N.V. Ulianchych Frantsevich Institute for Problems in Materials Science

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32471/exp-oncology.2312-8852.vol-43-no-3.16584

Keywords:

bone, HAP-TCP, implantation, reparative osteogenesis

Abstract

Summary. Background: Recently, bioactive ceramics based on hydroxyapatite (HAP) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP) have been preferred as implants in bone engineering. Aim: To study bone regeneration under conditions of filling metaphyseal defects with the original HAP-TCP composition. Materials and Methods: The experiment was carried out on inbred rats, the observation period was 2, 4, 8 weeks. Morphological studies were carried out using light and electron microscopy. Results: In the dynamics of observation at 2, 4 and 8 weeks, a gradual arrangement of osteoclasts and osteoblasts on the surface of HAP-TCP was recorded, which indicates its high biocompatibility with bone tissue. During the experiment, the processes of resorption of implants, mineralization, proliferation of cellular elements of collagen and osteogenesis (osteoblasts and osteoclasts) and the formation of mature bone tissue were recorded. Conclusions. Experimental studies of plastic bone defects proved the presence of the osteoinductive and osteointegrative effect of HAP-TCP composition, which contributes to a more dynamic uncomplicated course of reparative osteogenesis.

References

Burianov AA, Chornyi VS, Dedukh NV, et al. Bone regeneration study after osseous defect filling with bioglass powdered form. Annals Traumatol Orthoped 2018; 3–4: 10–4 (in Russian).

Fernandez de Grado G, Keller L, Idoux-Gillet Y, et al. Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management. J Tissue Eng 2018; 9: 2041731418776819. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041731418776819.

Ulianchych N, Mishchenko O, Kоndratets I, Zaitseva N. Controlled properties of osteotropic biomins implant material for various clinical applications (literature review and own results). Rus J Biol Res 2014; 2: 100–12 (in Russian).

National Cancer Registry of Ukraine. http://www.ncru.inf.ua/publications. Accessed December 26, 2020.

Cappellari A, Trovarelli G, Crimì A, et al. New concepts in the surgical treatment of actual and impending pathological fractures in metastatic disease. Injury 2020; 11: S0020-1383(20)30952-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.025.

Cardoso P, Rodrigues-Pinto R. Surgical management of bone and soft tissue sarcomas and skeletal metastases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46: 1178–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.027.

Jariwala SH, Lewis GS, Bushman ZJ, et al. 3D Printing of personalized artificial bone scaffolds. 3D Print Addit Manuf 2015; 2: 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2015.0001.

Agarwal R, García AJ. Biomaterial strategies for engineering implants for enhanced osseointegration and bone repair. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2015; 94: 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2015.03.013.

Turpin A, Duterque-Coquillaud M, Vieillard MH. Bone metastasis: current state of play. Transl Oncol 2020; 13: 308–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2019.10.012.

Ryan C, Stoltzfus KC, Horn S, et al. Epidemiology of bone metastases. Bone 2020: 115783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2020.115783.

Koren’kov OV. Morphological peculiarities of healing of experimental defects of a long bone cortex under the condition of β-tricalcium phosphate implantation. Orthopaed Traumatol Prosthet 2015; 3: 46–50. (in Ukrainian).

Bandini M, Pompe RS, Marchioni M, et al. Improved cancer-specific free survival and overall free survival in contemporary metastatic prostate cancer patients: A population-based study. Int Urol Nephrol 2018; 50: 71–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1744-2.

Wang Z, Cheng Y, Chen S, et al. Novel prognostic nomograms for female patients with breast cancer and bone metastasis at presentation. Ann Transl Med 2020; 8: 197. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.01.37.

D’Oronzo S, Silvestris E, Paradiso A, et al. Role of bone targeting agents in the prevention of bone metastases from breast cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21: 3022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21083022.

O’Keefe RJ, Mao J. Bone tissue engineering and regeneration: from discovery to the clinic — an overview. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2011; 17: 389–92. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2011.0475.

Kon E, Filardo G, Roffi A, et al. Bone regeneration with mesenchymal stem cells. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2012; 9: 24–7.

Shimon VM, Alfeldiy SP, Shimon MV, et al. Rationale for tricalcium phosphate preparation application in treatmewnt of long bones fractures and defects. Annals Traumatol Orthoped 2018; 39–40: 37–40 (in Ukrainian).

Downloads

Published

26.05.2023

How to Cite

Konovalenko, V., Ternovyi, N., Tuz, E., Protsenko, V., Solonitsyn, E., Audai, A., … Ulianchych, N. (2023). Experimental substantiation of the use of hydroxyapatite — tricalcium phosphate bioceramics for replacing bone defects after tumor removal. Experimental Oncology, 43(3), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.32471/exp-oncology.2312-8852.vol-43-no-3.16584

Issue

Section

Original contributions