INFLUENCE OF BIFIDOBACTERIUM ANIMALIS SUBSP. LACTIS BB-12 AND LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS GG ON POLARIZATION OF TUMOR-ASSOCIATED MACROPHAGES

Authors

  • N. Fedosova R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • T. Symchych R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • S. Gogol R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • N. Cheremshenko R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • P. Virych R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • I. Voyeykova R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • V. Chekhun R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15407/exp-oncology.2025.04.451

Keywords:

Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12; Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, Ehrlich carcinoma, tumor-associated macrophages, polarization

Abstract

Background. The microbiota has a significant impact on the host’s immune system. However, the influence of the microbiome is heavily dependent on species, strain, and context. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 (BB-12) and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) supplementation on the polarization of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in mice with Ehrlich carcinoma. Materials and Methods. Female Balb/c mice bearing solid Ehrlich carcinoma were administered via gavage with BB-12, LGG, or 0.9% NaCl. On days 14, 21, and 28 of tumor growth, macrophages from tumor tissue were isolated and subjected to functional analysis. The nitric oxide (NO) production was measured using the standard Griess reaction. The arginase activity was determined based on the urea measurements. The reactive oxygen species (ROS) production was checked using flow cytometry. The cytotoxic activity was estimated by an MTT assay. Results. The application of different probiotic bacteria elicited different TAM polarization states. The TAMs in the group supplemented with LGG demonstrated M1 polarization with low arginase activity but high production of NO and ROS, as well as cytotoxic activity toward Ehrlich carcinoma cells. The TAMs of BB-12-treated mice exhibited M2 (supposedly M2b) polarization, characterized by high arginase activity alongside the preserved cytotoxic activity toward Ehrlich carcinoma cells in vitro. Conclusion. The results indicate that the consumption of two probiotics, BB-12 and LGG, affects the polarization of TAMs in distantly located experimental tumors.

References

Chekhun VF, Lukianova N, Shvets YV. Effects of microbiotes on the development of human tumor pathologies

Oncology. 2020;22(1-2):11-13. (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.32471/oncology.2663-7928.t-22-1-2020-g.8759

Jungersen M, Wind A, Johansen E, et al. The science behind the probiotic strain Bifidobacterium animalis subsp.

lactis BB-12®. Microorganisms. 2014;2:92-110. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms2020092

Collins FWJ, Vera-Jiménez NI, Wellejus A. Understanding the probiotic health benefits of Bifidobacterium animalis

subsp. lactis, BB-12TM. Front Microbiol. 2025;16:1605044. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1605044

Lebeer S, Bron PA, Marco ML, et al. Identification of probiotic effector molecules: present state and future perspec- tives. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2018;49:217-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2017.10.007

Latvala S, Pietilä TE, Veckman V, et al. Potentially probiotic bacteria induce efficient maturation but differential cytokine production in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:5570. https://doi. org/10.3748/wjg.14.5570

Verbeek R, Bsibsi M, Plomp A, et al. Late rather than early responses of human dendritic cells highlight selective in- duction of cytokines, chemokines and growth factors by probiotic bacteria. Benef Microbes. 2010;1:109-119. https:// doi.org/10.3920/BM2009.0026

McFarland LV, Evans CT, Goldstein EJC. Strain-specificity and disease-specificity of probiotic efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med. 2018;5:124. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2018.00124

Council of Europe. European convention for the protection of vertebrate animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes [Internet]. Strasbourg; 18.03.1986. https://norecopa.no/media/2iydns5h/ets-123-original.pdf

Symchych TV, Fedosova NI, Chumak AV, et al. Functions of tumor-associated macrophages and macrophages residing in remote anatomical niches in Ehrlich carcinoma bearing mice. Exp Oncol. 2023;42:197-203. https://doi. org/10.32471/exp-oncology.2312-8852.vol-42-no-3.14928

Van De Loosdrecht AA, Beelen RHJ, Ossenkoppele GJ, et al. A tetrazolium-based colorimetric MTT assay to quan- titate human monocyte mediated cytotoxicity against leukemic cells from cell lines and patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Immunol Methods. 1994;174:311-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(94)90034-5

Macrophages and Dendritic Cells. Reiner NE, ed. Humana Totowa: NJ. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745- 396-7

Corraliza IM, Campo ML, Soler G, Modolell M. Determination of arginase activity in macrophages: a micrometh- od. J Immunol Methods. 1994;174:231-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(94)90027-2

Konopelnuk VI, Kompanets IV, Svyatetska VM, et al. Functional polarization of macrophages of rats with pro- gesterone-induced obesity treated with melanin from the antarctic yeast Nadsoniella nigra. Regul Mech Biosyst. 2019;10:538-543. https://doi.org/10.15421/021979

Rath M, Müller I, Kropf P, et al. Metabolism via arginase or nitric oxide synthase: two competing arginine pathways in macrophages. Front Immunol. 2014;5:532. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2014.00532

Sezginer O, Unver N. Dissection of pro-tumoral macrophage subtypes and immunosuppressive cells participating in M2 polarization. Inflamm Res. 2024;73:1411-1423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-024-01907-3

Biswas SK, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and interaction with lymphocyte subsets: cancer as a paradigm.

Nat Immunol. 2010;11:889-896. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.1937

Shi W, Cheng M, Yang X, et al. Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG promotes mouse gut microbiota diversity and T cell differentiation. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:607735. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fmicb.2020.607735

Fong FLY, Kirjavainen PV, El-Nezami H. Immunomodulation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG)-derived so- luble factors on antigen-presenting cells of healthy blood donors. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22845. https://doi.org/10.1038/ srep22845

Wang B, Wu Y, Liu R, et al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG promotes M1 polarization in murine bone marrow‐de- rived macrophages by activating TLR2/MyD88/MAPK signaling pathway. Anim Sci J. 2020;91:e13439. https://doi. org/10.1111/asj.13439

Matsumoto M, Hara K, Benno Y. The influence of the immunostimulation by bacterial cell components derived from altered large intestinal microbiota on probiotic anti-inflammatory benefits. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2007;49:387-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2007.00215.x

López P, Gueimonde M, Margolles A, Suárez A. Distinct Bifidobacterium strains drive different immune responses in vitro. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010;138:157-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.12.023

López P, González-Rodríguez I, Gueimonde M, et al. Immune response to Bifidobacterium bifidum strains support Treg/Th17 plasticity. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e24776. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024776

Gogol S, Virych P, Fedosova N, et al. Immunomodulating effect of probiotics B. animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 and L. rhamnosus GG during tumor growth. Oncology. 2025;27:129-138. https://doi.org/10.15407/oncology.2025.02.129 (in Ukrainian).

Wang L, Zhang S, Wu H, et al. M2b macrophage polarization and its roles in diseases. J Leukoc Biol. Oxford Uni- versity Press (OUP); 2019;106:345–358. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlb.3ru1018-378rr

Du H, Cai Y, Shen L, et al. Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis modulates early-life immune response and gut metabolism. Animal Model Exp Med. 2025;8(6):965-976. https://doi.org/10.1002/ame2.70034

Laursen MF, Sakanaka M, Von Burg N, et al. Bifidobacterium species associated with breastfeeding produce aro- matic lactic acids in the infant gut. Nat Microbiol. 2021;6:1367-1382. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-021-00970-4

Ye X, Li H, Anjum K, et al. Dual role of indoles derived from intestinal microbiota on human health. Front Immu- nol. 2022;13:903526. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.903526

Wang J, Zhu N, Su X, et al. Gut-microbiota-derived mtabolites maintain gut and systemic immune homeostasis.

Cells. 2023;12:793. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12050793

Zhang Q, Zhao Q, Li T, et al. Lactobacillus plantarum-derived indole-3-lactic acid ameliorates colorectal tumori- genesis via epigenetic regulation of CD8+ T cell immunity. Cell Metab. 2023;35:943-960.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.cmet.2023.04.015

Zhang Z, Zheng K, Zhang Z, et al. Lactobacillus gasseri LGV03-derived indole-3-lactic acid ameliorates immune re- sponse by activating aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Microb Cell Factories. 2025;24:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934- 025-02662-8

Bender MJ, McPherson AC, Phelps CM, et al. Dietary tryptophan metabolite released by intratumoral Lactobacillus reuteri facilitates immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Cell. 2023;186:1846-1862.e26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2023.03.011

Leser T, Baker A. Molecular mechanisms of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, LGG® probiotic function. Microorga- nisms. 2024;12:794. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12040794

Downloads

Published

05.03.2026

How to Cite

Fedosova, N., Symchych, T., Gogol, S., Cheremshenko, N., Virych, P., Voyeykova, I., & Chekhun, V. (2026). INFLUENCE OF BIFIDOBACTERIUM ANIMALIS SUBSP. LACTIS BB-12 AND LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS GG ON POLARIZATION OF TUMOR-ASSOCIATED MACROPHAGES. Experimental Oncology, 47(4), 451–458. https://doi.org/10.15407/exp-oncology.2025.04.451

Issue

Section

Original contributions