Ukrainian prospective study in patients with T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32471/exp-oncology.2312-8852.vol-43-no-4.17151Keywords:
incidence, overall survival, prognostic factor., progression free survival, response to treatment, T-cell lymphomaAbstract
Summary. Background: T-cell lymphoma (TCL) is a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative diseases that account for 10–15% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The aim of the study was to analyze the incidence of TCL in Ukraine, distribution according to subtypes and to assess the results of treatment of patients with TCL depending on lymphoma subtype and clinical-and-laboratory risk factors. Patients and Methods: Data from 70 patients with TCL were analyzed from February 2018 to May 2021. T-cell lymphoid neoplasms were diagnosed according to the 2016 WHO classification. The patients were divided into 4 groups: 1st (A) — leukemic forms (n = 13) (received SMILE or HyperCVAD +/- auto/alloSCT); 2nd (B) — nodal T-cell lymphomas (n = 43) (CHOP-like regimens); 3rd (C) — cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (n = 9) (PUVA therapy, interferon, and methotrexate); 4th (D) — extranodal T-cell lymphomas (n = 5) (CHOP-like regimens). The response was determined according to the Lugano 2014 criteria. Results: According to the study results, 5–6% of all non-Hodgkin lymphoma registered in Ukraine in 2018–2020 were T-cell lymphomas. The most common subtype was peripheral TCL (61%). In the studied groups of TCL patients, the overall response rate was 50% (n = 35). 2-years event-free survival rate was 62.27%. 2-years overall survival rate was 65.76%. 18-month progression-free and overall survival in group B was higher versus groups A, C and D. The factors of unfavorable prognosis were bone marrow involvement and the expression of Ki67 > 65% (p = 0.03 and p = 0.006, respectively). Conclusions: Histologic subtype of T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma influence the treatment outcome. The best overall response rate, overall survival rate, progression-free survival were in group of patients with nodal T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas, the worst — in patients from leukemic group. Poor prognostic factors are bone marrow involvement, and Ki-67 expression > 65%.
References
Fedorenko Z, Michailovich Yu, Goulak L, et al. Cancer in Ukraine 2019–2020. Incidence, mortality, prevalence and other relevant statistics. Bull Nat Cancer Reg Ukr 2021; 22. Available at http://ncru.inf.ua/publications/index.htm
Swerdlow S, Campo E, Pileri S, et al. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Blood 2016; 127: 2375–90. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-01-643569
Federico M, Bellei M, Pesce E, et al. T-Cell Project: an international, longitudinal, observational study of patients with aggressive peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 2009; 31: 21–5. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-84842009000800007
Advani RH, Skrypets T, Civallero M, et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma: final report from the international T-cell Project. Blood 2021; 138: 213–20. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2020010387
Skrypets T, Novosad O, Pastushenko Y, et al. Ukrainian data on prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Klin Onkol 2019; 32: 436–44. https://doi.org/10.14735/amko2019436
Schmitz N, Truemper L, Bouabdallah K, et al. A randomized phase 3 trial of autologous vs allogeneic transplantation as part of first-line therapy in poor-risk peripheral T-NHL. Blood 2021; 137: 2646–56. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2020008825
Lopez-Guillermo A, Cid J, Salar A, et al. Peripheral T-cell lymphomas: initial features, natural history, and prognostic factors in a series of 174 patients diagnosed according to the R.E.A.L. Classification. Ann Oncol 1998; 9: 849–55. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008418727472
Van Heertum RL, Scarimbolo R, Wolodzko JG, et al. Lugano 2014 criteria for assessing FDG-PET/CT in lymphoma: an operational approach for clinical trials. Drug Des Devel Ther 2017; 11: 1719–28. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S136988
d’Amore F, Gaulard P, Trümper L, et al. Peripheral T-cell lymphomas: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol 2015; 26: v108–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv201
Zheng X, He X, Yang Y, et al. Association of improved overall survival with decreased distant metastasis following asparaginase-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy for intermediate- and high-risk early-stage extranodal nasal-type NK/T-cell lymphoma: a CLCG study. ESMO Open 2021; 6: 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100206
Willemze R, Hodak E, Zinzani P, et al. Primary cutaneous lymphomas: ESMO clinical practice guideline. Ann Oncol 2018; 29: iv30–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy133
Horwitz S, O’Connor O, Pro B, et al. Brentuximab vedotin with chemotherapy for CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphoma (ECHELON-2): a global, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2019; 393: 229–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32984-2
Savage K, Harris NL, Vose JM, et al. ALK-anaplastic large-cell lymphoma is clinically and immunophenotypically different from both ALK+ ALCL and peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified: report from the International Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Project. Blood 2008; 111: 5496–504. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-01-134270
Fuji S, Kida S, Nakata K, et al. Increased incidence of adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma and peripheral T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified with limited improvement in overall survival: a retrospective analysis using data from the population-based Osaka Cancer Registry. Ann Hematol 2021; 100: 157–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-020-04308-8
Rubio-Gonzalez B, Zain J, Rosen S, et al. Clinical manifestations and pathogenesis of cutaneous lymphomas: current status and future directions. Br J Haemat 2017; 176: 16–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.14402
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Experimental Oncology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.