Metformin enhances antitumor action of sodium dichloroacetate against glioma C6

Authors

  • D.L. Kolesnik R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology
  • O.N. Pyaskovskaya R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology
  • O.V. Yurchenko R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology
  • G.I. Solyanik R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32471/exp-oncology.2312-8852.vol-41-no-2.13064

Keywords:

glioma C6, metformin, sodium dichloroacetate

Abstract

Summary. It is known that the arsenal of chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of malignant brain tumors is quite limited, which causes the high relevance of research aimed at finding new effective antitumor regimens, including the use of energy metabolism modifiers. Aim: To investigate the anti-glioma activity of sodium dichloroacetate (DCA) and metformin (MTF) used in combination in vitro and in vivo. Materials and Methods: Cell survival, cell cycle, apoptosis, mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm), ATP level, the glucose consumption rate, and lactate production rate were determined in vitro in cultured glioma C6 cells. The antitumor action of agents in vivo was evaluated routinely by the prolongation of the life span of rats with transplanted intracerebral glioma C6 and was confirmed by histological examination of tumor tissue. Results: The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) for DCA and MTF used separately was 79.2 ± 2.1 mM and 78.4 ± 4.0 mM, respectively, whereas IC50 for DCA used in combination with 7.8 mM MTF was 3.3 fold lower (24.0 ± 1.2 mM, p < 0.05). The 1-day incubation of cells with DCA at a concentration close to IC50 (25 mM), in combination with MTF at a concentration by order lower than IC50 (7.8 mM), in contrast to their separate use, resulted in a decrease in the number of viable cells by 40% (p < 0.05); redistribution of the cells by the cell cycle phases toward decreased proportion of cells in the S-phase by 46% (p < 0.05) and an increased percentage of cells in the G0/G1 phase by 24% (p < 0.05) compared to similar indices in the control. High proapoptotic activity of DCA in combination with MTF was supported by a significantly higher percentage of apoptotic cells in vitro than in the control (18.9 ± 4.4% vs 5.7 ± 1.3%, p < 0.05) and a high number of tumor cells with signs of apoptosis revealed during the histological examination of tumor pathomorphosis. The combined effect of DCA and MTF resulted in almost 4-fold decrease of the glucose consumption rate by glioma C6 cells (0.23 ± 0.05 μmol/106 cells/h vs 0.91 ± 0.12 μmol/106 cells/h, p < 0.05) compared to the corresponding parameters in the control, and 2-fold increased rate of lactate production (1.06 ± 0.03 μmol/106 cells/h vs 0.53 ± 0.03 μmol/106 cells/h, p < 0.05). At the same time, both Δψm and the level of intracellular ATP in the glioma C6 cells treated with DCA and MTF, both separately and in combination, did not differ significantly from those indices in the control. In in vivo studies, the average life span of rats with intracranial transplanted glioma C6, treated with DCA in combination with MTF in a total dose of 1.1 and 2.6 g/kg body weight, respectively, was 50% higher (p < 0.001) than in the control group. In contrast, in the case of single-use (at a dose of 2.6 g/kg), MTF increased the life span of tumor-bearing animals just by 19% (p < 0.01), whereas DCA alone (at a dose of 1.1 g/kg) did not significantly change the survival time of rats. Conclusions: The obtained data indicate synergism of anti-glioma action of DCA and MTF in a case of their combined use both in vitro and in vivo and may be considered a starting point for the development of effective treatment regimens for malignant brain tumors based on the combined use of DCA and MTF.

References

Taal W, Bromberg JE, van den Bent MJ. Chemotherapy in glioma. CNS Oncol 2015; 4: 179–92.

Chowdhary MM, Ene CI, Silbergeld DL. Treatment of gliomas: how did we get here? Surg Neurol Int 2015; 6: S85–8.

Wang Y, Xing D, Zhao M, et al. The role of a single angiogenesis inhibitor in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a meta-analysis and systematic review. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0152170.

Ameratunga M, Pavlakis N, Wheeler H, et al. Anti-angiogenic therapy for high-grade glioma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 11: CD008218.

Agnihotri S, Zadeh G. Metabolic reprogramming in glioblastoma: the influence of cancer metabolism on epigenetics and unanswered questions. Neuro-Oncol 2016; 18: 160–72.

Weber GF. Time and circumstances: cancer cell metabolism at various stages of disease progression. Front Oncol 2016; 6: 257.

Seyfried TN, Sanderson TM, El-Abbadi MM, et al. Role of glucose and ketone bodies in the metabolic control of experimental brain cancer. Br J Cancer 2003; 89: 1375–82.

Seliger C, Meyer A-L, Renner K, et al. Metformin inhibits proliferation and migration of glioblastoma cells independently of TGF-β2. Cell Cycle 2016; 15: 1755–66.

Sesen J, Dahan P, Scotland SJ, et al. Metformin inhibits growth of human glioblastoma cells and enhances therapeutic response. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0123721.

Seliger C, Renner K. P08.52 Metformin as adjuvant therapy for glioma. Neuro-Oncology 2017; 19: iii65.

Michelakis ED, Sutendra G, Dromparis P, et al. Metabolic modulation of glioblastoma with dichloroacetate. Sci Transl Med 2010; 2: 31ra34.

Duan Y, Zhao X, Ren W, et al. Antitumor activity of dichloroacetate on C6 glioma cell: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Onco Targets Ther 2013; 6: 189–98.

Fedorchuk AG, Pyaskovskaya ON, Gorbik GV, et al. Effectiveness of sodium dichloroacetate against glioma C6 depends on administration schedule and dosage. Exp Oncol 2016; 38: 80–3.

Nicoletti I, Migliorati G, Pagliacci MC, et al. A rapid and simple method for measuring thymocyte apoptosis by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods 1991; 139: 271–80.

Wheaton WW, Weinberg SE, Hamanaka RB, et al. Metformin inhibits mitochondrial complex I of cancer cells to reduce tumorigenesis. eLife 2014; 3: e02242.

Michelakis ЕD, Websterl L, Mackey JR. Dichloroacetate (DCA) as a potential metabolic-targeting therapy for cancer. Br J Cancer 2008; 99: 989–94.

Pyaskovskaya ON, Kolesnik DL, Fedorchuk AG, et al. Cytotoxic activity of metformin in vitro does not correlate with its antitumor action in vivo. Exp Oncol 2017; 39: 264–8.

Bo Li, Xinzhe Li, Zhenhong Ni, et al. Dichloroacetate and metformin synergistically suppress the growth of ovarian cancer cells. Oncotarget 2016; 7: 59458–90.

Zhou G, Myers R, Li Y, et al. Role of AMP-activated protein kinase in mechanism of metformin action. J Clin Invest 2001; 108: 1167–74.

Abdelmalak M, Lew A, Ramezani R, et al. Long-term safety of dichloroacetate in congenital lactic acidosis. Mol Genet Metab 2013; 109: 139–43.

Prokhorova IV, Pyaskovskaya ON, Kolesnik DL, Solyanik GI. Influence of metformin, sodium dichloroacetate and their combination on the hematological and biochemical blood parameters of rats with glioma C6. Exp Oncol 2018; 40: 205–10.

Downloads

Published

05.06.2023

How to Cite

Kolesnik, D., Pyaskovskaya, O., Yurchenko, O., & Solyanik, G. (2023). Metformin enhances antitumor action of sodium dichloroacetate against glioma C6. Experimental Oncology, 41(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.32471/exp-oncology.2312-8852.vol-41-no-2.13064

Issue

Section

Original contributions

Most read articles by the same author(s)