Theoretical ground for adsorptive therapy of anthracyclines cardiotoxicity

Shevchuk O.O.1, Posokhova E.A.1, Sakhno L.A.*2, Nikolaev V.G.2

Summary. Anthracyclines play an important role in treatment of variety types of cancer due to their high effectiveness and broad spectrum of activity. However, a major limitation of their use is the dose-limiting cardiotoxicity. The inability to predict and prevent anthracycline cardiotoxicity is in part due to the fact that the molecular and cellular mechanisms remain controversial and incompletely understood. This review focuses on the biochemical basis of the anthracyclines toxic cardiac effects and pharmacological measures to their treatment and preventing. We describe the theoretical substantiation of the enterosorption abilities for diminishing of cardiac damage.


Received: October 12, 2012.
*Correspondence: E-mail:
Abbreviations used: cTnT — cardiac troponine T; DOX — doxorubicin; DOXol — doxorubicinol; DNR — daunorubicin; EPI — epirubicin; HF – heart failure; IDA — idarubicin; DCMP — dilated cardiomyopathy; СHF — congestive heart failure; LMW Fe(II) — low molecular weight Fe(II); LPS — lipopolysaccharide; NT-proBNP — N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide.

Anthracyclines (doxorubicin, daunorubicin, epirubicin and others), taking into account their high effectiveness in the treatment of significant number of tumors, nowadays remain the most in-demand class of chemopreparations used in oncological practice, including pediatric oncology [3, 24, 118, 130].

By chemical structure these preparations are represented by hydrotetracenequinone chromophores containing three planar hexatomic rings which are linked with one or several sugar residues. The differences between separate preparations are related to the structure of aglycone or hydrocarbon part of the molecule (Fig. 1) [111].

 Theoretical ground for adsorptive therapy of anthracyclines cardiotoxicity
Fig. 1. Chemical structures of main anthracyclines: doxorubicin (adriamycin) — DOX, daunorubicin — DNR, epirubicin — EPI, idarubicin — IDA. The differences between drugs are marked by arrow

The mechanisms of therapeutic action of anthracyclines are very multivarious [27, 67]: 1) DNA intercalation and suppression of macromolecules synthesis; 2) generation of free radicals with the following activation of lipid peroxidation (LPO); 3) binding with DNA molecule and its alkylation; 4) direct action toward membranes; 5) initiation of DNA damage by inhibition of topoisomerase II; 6) induction of apoptosis.

Anthracyclines possess expressed radiomimetic properties: the dynamics of disorders of blood system has a lot in common with the picture observed upon ionizing radiation injury [6, 26]. As well as other intercalating agents, anthracyclines are capable to suppress an activity of DNA reparation enzymes. It is known that the synthetic phase of cell mitosis and the transition point of presynthetic phase into synthetic one are the most sensitive to polychemotherapy. Anthracycline antibiotics implement their cytotoxic action simultaneously at different phases of mitotic cycle what determines their high therapeutic activity and in parallel — significant side effects.

One of the most available and effective preparations of this group, doxorubicin (DOX, adriamycin) is a derivative of rubomycin — 14-hydrorubomycin, and it is an irreplaceable component of Breast cancer treatment protocols, adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy of solid tumors in children, soft tissue sarcomas, aggressive lymphomas and hemoblastoses [67]. In the organism DOX is transformed into 13–dihydrodoxorubicinol (DOXol) by dint of cytochrome Р450 system and finally — into free radical state of semiquinone type. Free radicals of this anticancer antibiotic quickly react with molecular oxygen and promote an accumulation of LPO products and damage of structural and functional organization of cells’ systems [27].

The main side effects of anthracyclines are typical for the majority of antineoplastic preparations and are represented by nausea and vomiting, bone marrow depression, damaging of intestinal epithelium of and other mucosal surfaces as well as hair follicles, suppression of reproductive function, etc. [125]. Differential peculiarity of DOX, as well as other anthracyclines, is its significant cardiotoxic action along with other side effects characteristic for the majority of cytostatic agents. Dose dependent injury of cardiac muscle is considered the most significant factor that limits the use of the preparations related to this type [34, 37].

Acute and especially chronic DOX cardiotoxicity leads finally to fatal dilated cardiomyopathy (DCMP), and results in so dangerous clinical manifestations (in the case of development of congestive heart failure (CHF) the mortality rate reaches 60% [132]), that modern schemes of monitoring of side effects of anthracycline chemotherapy prescribe an evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction before treatment initiation and after achievement of ½ of cumulative dose with the following measuring of this index after each new treatment course with the use of anthracyclines and continuation of such control on 3rd, 6th and 12th months after therapy termination [21]. According to other data, 50% of patients which had experience of anthracycline chemotherapy die from CHF caused by their cardiotoxicity during two years from the moment of diagnosis of anthracycline cardiomyopathy despite the performed therapy [41, 113].

There are the following risk factors of cardiac lesion development: 1) cumulative dose of the preparation > 550 mg/m2 and higher (after an achievement of cumulative dose, as a rule DCMP develops during a year); 2) age (under 3 and after 65 years); 3) radiotherapy of mediastinum; 4) simultaneous administration of other cardiotoxic agents; 5) female gender; 6) concomitant cardiac pathology; 7) bolus administration of the preparation [35]. The cases of CHF development have been reported also for obtained cumulative dose that was twice lower than the critical one [62, 114].

The mechanisms of damage of the heart upon anthracycline cardiomyopathy are multiple and are not completely studied yet. It is supposed that cardiotoxicity is related to generation of free radicals by “anthracycline-iron” complex and injury of myocardium caused by LPO products [45, 67]. EPR-studies have shown that during this process mitochondrial, nuclear and microsomal reductases catalyze an attachment of electron to quinone residue of tetracycline ring of anthracyclines leading to formation of semiquinone free radical that generates superoxide anion radical О2•– and hydrogen peroxide H2O2. Toxicity of the latest multiply increases upon reaction with low molecular weight iron (LMW Fe). In this case, ferritin is a physiologic protector that serves as a safe storage of cytosol source of high molecular weight iron compounds in soluble and nontoxic form. However, LMW Fe could be replaced from this transport form by О2•– radical and anthracycline semiquinone radicals [131]. In the majority of cells defense enzymes of antioxidant system (superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase) reduce to minimum the damaging action of these factors, but the pool of endogenous antioxidants of cardiomyocytes is very limited and couldn’t provide adequate reaction to anthracycline-induced oxidative stress what finally leads to degeneration and descent of cardiac muscle contractility (Fig. 2).

 Theoretical ground for adsorptive therapy of anthracyclines cardiotoxicity
Fig. 2. The “iron and free radical hypothesis of cardiotoxicity of anthracyclines (DOX)”. F/FH— oxidized/reduced flavoproteins (e.g., NADH dehydrogenase, NADPH cytochrome P450 reductase); LMW Fe(II), low molecular weight Fe(II); OH, hydroxyl radical; FeIV=O, ferryl ion; DOX•Fe, doxorubicin-iron complex

By an opinion of some authors, as an alternative to a theory of free radical injury of cardiomyocytes, or as its supplement, so called “metabolic” theory could be considered [37, 62, 67]. DOX cardiotoxicity could be explained by cardiac muscle accumulation of its highly reactive alcoholic metabolite doxorubicinol (DOXol) that inhibits Са2+, Mg2+-dependent ATPase of sarcoplasmic reticulum, f0-f1 proton pomp of mitochondria and transport of Na+-Ca2+ in sarcolemma, thus disturbing intracellular energetic metabolism, ion gradients and balance of Ca2+ [62, 66]. It is known that mitochondria, the main suppliers of ATP to cells, yield up to 30% of total myocardium weight. An important factor that promotes toxic action of DOX on cardiomyocytes, is its high affinity to cardiolipin — anionic phospholipid which is specific for mitochondrial membrane and important component supporting of mitochondrial structure and function as well as total energetic metabolism and survival of cells [28, 42, 73]. Another factor of cardiotoxicity caused by DOX is the violation of mitochondrial membrane permeability [70].

In a number of studies there has been found a tight relation and certain prognostic value of elevated level of proinflammatory cytokines, especially tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), Interleukin-1β (IL–1β), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and their soluble receptors with the intensity of heart failure (HF) and decreasing of left ventricular ejection fraction. Elevated cytokines’ level in case of HF is not only a marker of immune activation, i.e. epiphenomenon of severe course of disease, but also it directly affects the development of myocardial dysfunction and remodeling of left ventricle [65, 126]. The mostly studied effects of TNF–α are negative inotropic action, myocardial remodeling, and myocardial fibrosis, reinduction of fetal phenotype of myocardium, apoptosis of cardiomyocytes, endothelial dysfunction, skeletal muscle myopathy, myocardium cachexia [56]. Increased levels of Interleukin-8 promote the deve­lopment of insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus in patients with DCMP [8].

In last time there is actively discussed the theory of cardiomyopathy development as a consequence of endotoxicosis (Fig. 3). Colon that serves as the main depot of bacterial endotoxins (LPS) is sensitive to damaging action of antiblastoma preparations. Injury of colon mucosa, edema and ischemia of enteric wall promote bacterial translocation leading to release of LPS, immuno-inflammatory activation and cytokines release [47, 107].

 Theoretical ground for adsorptive therapy of anthracyclines cardiotoxicity
Fig. 3. The role of the gut in HF [Krack A et al., 2005]

It’s important to note that approximately 30% of DOX is eliminated with bile in unaltered form thus causing additional cytotoxic action toward intestinal mucosa [2].

As other genotoxic drugs, DOX initiates р53–mediated cell death [117]. It is known that p53 gene is an important regulator of cell division and death. It has been demonstrated that its chemical inhibition prevents DOX-induced cell death and the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential [52]. There have been described also alterations of vasoactive mediator production upon HF development, in particular, of endothelin-1 and nitric oxide [15, 23, 104]. Vasoconstrictive cytokines, endothelin-1 and big endothelin-1, which are responsible for contractility, arrhythmogenesis and remodeling of myocardium, are related also to the category of prognostic indicators of patient’s survival ill with HF [43, 61, 95] and play an important role in pathogenesis and progression of cardiomyopathy.

Certain role in CHF development is thought to be related to oxidant-dependent activation of heat shock factors by DOX with the following expression of heat shock proteins (Hsp): Hsp25 which leads to actin destruction [123], and Hsp60, which functions mainly in mitochondria [44]. Also, there have been described such processes as enzymatic activation of binding of DOX with nuclear DNA [112], selective alteration of cardiac mRNA coding important protein of myocardium as αС–actin [91], and elevation of phospholipase activity mediated by LPO [83]. Some investigators attach great importance to dysfunction of calcium channels [116], proteolysis of titin (known also as connectin which plays an important role in muscle contractility), and disintegration of cardiac transcription factors concordance [19, 33].

Subclinical myocardial damage caused by anthracyclines could be diagnosed with the use of standard ECG, Holter monitoring, high resolution ECG, evaluation of heart rhythm variability, echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography, myocardium scintigraphy, magnetic resonance tomography, analysis of concentrations of cardiac enzymes and other biochemical markers of cardiomyocyte damage [128]. However, upon subclinical heart damage, the majority of routine monitoring methods demonstrates low prognostic sensitivity while myocardial biopsy is an invasive process, technically complex and unsafe [4, 89]. That’s why the use of biochemical markers for monitoring of anthracycline based chemotherapy and selection of prophylaxis of cardiomyopathy development in patients without notable manifestations of myocardial damage seems to be more reasonable. Presently, the use of lactate dehydrogenase (LDG) and creatinphosphokinase (CPK) is not recommended because of their low specificity. In this sense, natriuretic peptides (atrial natriuretic peptide — ANP and brain natriuretic peptide — BNP) are more informative. These neurohormones play a key role in the support of compensated state in patients with initial CHF manifestations, firstly, due to their influence on renal homeostasis, water-electrolytic balance and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system at the conditions of decreased cardiac ejection. Terminal fragment of BNP precursor — NT-proBNP (N-terminal prohormone of brain natruretic peptide) — has more prolonged half-life period, so the latest studies have been done with NT-proBNP which is secreted in heart ventricles in response to volume and pressure overloads [21]. Blood plasma content of NT-proBNP and BNP are increased during the first year after chemotherapy with moderate anthracycline doses [16]. It is necessary to note that there have been obtained no valuable proofs of prognostic significance of natriuretic peptide levels, but an increase of their blood plasma concentration could be used for selection of patients with higher risk of heart dysfunction development in late-term and respectively these who require more intense supportive therapy. There has been also detected a relation between concentration of carnitine, lipid peroxidase level in blood plasma and myocardial dysfunction [11, 50].

Despite a large number of proposed biochemical markers, the most reliable method of myocardial dysfunction prognosis is considered to be determination of level of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) which is excreted in blood due to cardiomyocyte membrane destruction [82]. In many studies it has been shown that even moderate elevation of cTnT induced by DOX, is associated with histological signs of myocardial damage [36].

By clinical patterns one could distinguish acute and chronic cardiotoxicity [37, 50, 129]. Acute form deve­lops at the moment of administration of the preparation or few hours after it and is manifested by transitory arrhythmia and hypotension that could be treated effectively. Chronic cardiotoxicity leads to the development of congestive HF that is refractory to standard inotropic agents [66]. Some authors distinguish its early form (which occurs during the first year) and late form (that develops from 1st till 30th years with the pike at 7–10th years) [62]. Creutzig U. et al. [17] point out that more often chronic cardiomyotoxicity develops in children who already underwent an acute form of cardiomyotoxicity or received repeated treatment courses with anthracyclines, even in the cases when the preparations with lower cardiotoxic potential have been used.

Taking into account the facts that in people with survival higher than 5 years after anticancer treatment with the use of anthracyclines, the mortality risk related to heart pathology is 10 fold higher than that in total population [99], as well as nearly 60% of patients who survived after childhood cancer, receive the preparations exactly from this group [102], the search for effective methods of prophylaxis and mitigation of cardiotoxic effects of anthracyclines is extremely actual. First of all, it is the screening for risk factor presence in the patients, correction of cumulative dose of anthracyclines, and active monitoring of subclinical myocardial damage [4]. The synthesis and deve­lopment of new preparations with lower cardiotoxic action including their liposomal forms, is important, too [13, 38, 97, 105, 119]. Also, it is reasonable to use active curative-prophylactic administration of cardioprotectors with antioxidant properties, in particular, organic amifostine thiosulphate [94], L-carnitine [133], N-acetylcysteine, vitamin Е [40], thiotriazoline [14], flavonoid rutoside [121], etc. There are also used cholesterol-depletion agent probucol [49, 58], beta-blockers [63], calcium channel inhibitors [69, 122] and their combination with activators of ATP-sensitive potassium channels [68]. Rovustatin and probucol possess fine antiapoptotic potential toward cardiomyocytes and are classic lipid-lowering drugs [84, 106]. There is also known a cardioprotective effect of adenosine that increases intracellular ATP concentration and adenylate potential in total [72]. By the data of Cardinale D. et al., early administration of ACE-blocker enalapril nearly totally prevents the development of HF in the risk group [12]. However, in analogous study devoted to cardioprotective action of enalapril in children who underwent intense chemotherapy, the use of this preparation resulted just in moderate effect [110]. Interesting experimental results have been recorded upon the use of erythropoietin, thromboplastin, and synthetic prostacyclin iloprost usually used for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, as cardioprotectors [53, 55, 71]. By our opinion, the use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor for prophylaxis of DOX-induced DCMP seems to be especially perspective [54], because this cytokine is simultaneously the most potent myeloprotective agent. Iron-chelating agent cardioxane demonstrates good results in prophylaxis of acute and chronic DOX-induced cardiomyopathy; however, its influence on efficacy of cytostatic anthracycline-based therapy is speculative [29, 32, 57]. Cardioxane usage is limited by its characteristic myelotoxicity, nausea and diarrhea [25].

So, despite intense scientific efforts, the mechanisms of cardiotoxicity development upon anthracycline-based chemotherapy remain incompletely studied yet while the possibilities of modern preventive and curative strategies, unfortunately, are still limited. An absence of safe methods of prophylaxis and treatment of anthracycline cardiomyopathy forces the search of new ways to solve this problem. From this point of view, the use of modern approaches of sorption therapy is very perspective. It is known that sorption technologies are among the main components of efferent medicine — science about curative measures directed toward removal of toxic compounds of endogenous and exogenous origin from body fluids [74]. The most widely used types of sorption detoxification are purification of blood and its components by hemosorption, oral administration of large doses of sorption materials, and also application sorption therapy of burns and wounds. It s commonly known that in cancer patients an expressed endogenous intoxication is determined by tumorogenous process as well as by curative means directed toward destruction of malignant lesions [76]. So called “tumor disposition” (the state developed during natural course of malignant pathology) is based on the stable LPO activation, development of oxidative stress [59], and “metabolic intoxication” which is related to dysfunction of excretory organs, i.e. accumulation of excessive amounts of toxic intermediate and terminal metabolites [100]. Thus, the necessity of use of detoxification means and methods in oncology is evident. For example, upon DMCP there have been received positive results of plasmaimmunosorption that were expressed in decreased level of а NT-pro BNP marker and significant elevation of ejection fraction from 25.5 to 30.9% [20]. Very perspective and effective in such cases could be another method of detoxification — enterosorption that is noninvasive in contrary to hemosorption, and plasmapheresis.

The term “enterosorption” has been used since 1982 [77].

Local mechanisms of curative action of enterosorbents [Nikolaev V.G., 2009]:

1) adsorption of exogenic toxic compounds;

2) adsorption of toxins that diffuse in intestinal lumen from blood;

3) binding of toxic compounds excreted together with digestive juices;

4) adsorption of toxic metabolites generated in GIT (indol, skatol etc.);

5) sorption modification of diet via selective adsorption of its compounds;

6) fixation and transfer of physiologically active compounds (enzymes, bile acids etc);

7) enhancement of indigestible residue volume by the type of action of dietary fibers;

8) catalytic action;

9) coating and cytoprotective action;

10) structuring of intestinal content;

11) formation of aggregates and flocculates containing microbes and viruses;

12) direct bactericidal action;

13) complex formation and chelating

14) modification of chemical composition of intestinal content hindering pathogenic flora propagation;

15) normalization of enteric microbiocenosis;

16) elimination of meteorism, improvement of blood supply of intestine, stimulation of peristalsis.

Systemic (extraintestinal) effects of entersorption are: 1) prevention or attenuation of toxico-allergic reactions; 2) prophylaxis of somatogenic stage of exotoxicosis; 3) decreasing of metabolic load on excretory and detoxification organs; 4) positive correction of a number of metabolic processes and elements of immune status; 5) improving of humoral homeostasis, elimination of imbalance of biologically active compounds; 6) restoration of integrity and penetrability of cell membranes as well as regenerative potential of organs and tissues; 7) suppression of LPO processes; 8) improvement of lipidogram indexes; 9) normalization of cytokine profile of blood plasma [5, 78].

Multifaceted action of enteral sorption detoxification has made it an important component for treatment of such pathologies as acute intestinal infections [81], colitis and enterocolitis, dysbacteriosis [108], various intoxications [90], kidney diseases [22], especially which are accompanied by chronic renal insufficiency [75], and also atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, bronchial asthma, viral hepatitis, some autoimmune and skin diseases [109].

Influence of enterosorption on the development of oxidative stress has exceptional importance. It is known that increasing of usual speed of free radical oxidation serves as universal mechanism of development of many pathologic processes [51]. In experimental studies there has been shown an efficacy of silicon-organic enterosorbent Enterosgel for decreasing the content of LPO products and improvement of antioxidant defense at the background of usage of combined antituberculosis drugs [86, 93]. Also there has been described an effectiveness of chitosan for correction of excessive LPO upon the use of rifampicin and isoniazid [103]. Introduction of Polysorb into treatment schemes for patients with tuberculosis increases an efficacy of polychemotherapy and decreases the manifestation of side effects [39]. Administration of SUMS-1 enterosorbent decreases the LPO level, affects the shape of pharmacokinetic curves for isoniazid without alteration of total area under the curve, and attenuates drug resistance to some groups of antibiotics [46]. It was found the decreasing of negative influence of excessive LPO by enterosorbents improves prognosis upon toxic and viral hepatitis [98, 124]. There has been registered a positive effect of enterosorption in case of congestive HF developing due to ischemic heart disease and arterial hypertension. Schemes which included carbon sorbent SCN and cardiac glycosides were by 21% (Р<0.05) more effective than the use of strophantin or digoxin without SCN [80]. Enterosgel successfully protects the membranes and stabilizes hepatocyte lysosomes during aggressive anticancer chemotherapy [30]. In mentioned study cyclophosphamide, vincristin, and prednisolone were administered to rats. In groups with concomitant Enterosgel usage (1 g/kg for 7 days after cytostatics administration), there has been observed the decreasing of cytolysis markers (ALT, AST) and lysosomal enzymes. So, as it has been mentioned above, enterosorbents reveal expressed distant effects without systemic pharmacokinetics and significantly decrease toxic loads on excretory body systems [90, 127], as well as endogenous intoxication level upon severe infectious diseases [1] and burns [87, 120].

Cytokines are universal regulators of homeostasis, which may initiate multiple pathologic processes [60]. The decreasing of the level of proinflammatory cytokines upon the influence of enterosorbents observed in the case of thermal trauma [88], food allergy [64, 85], intestinal infection and measles [115], pancreonecrosis [96], creates abilities for effective use of enterosorbents in a number of other clinical situations including anticancer chemotherapy.

There have been described positive clinical effects of carbon sorbent SUMS-1 in cancer treatment what allowed to decrease the dosages of analgesics, myelotoxicity of polychemotherapy, and level of endogenous intoxication [10]. Granulated carbon enterosorbent SCN have demonstrated the decreasing of rubomycin myelotoxicity in rats with inoculated tumors as well as the presence of moderate leukostimulative effect upon clinical polychemotherapy [9]. Also it has been shown that carbon enterosorbent Carboline possess notable antiemetic activity upon different polychemotherapy schemes [92]. In patients with resectable colon cancer an introduction of enterosorption into the complex of curative actions has decreased the frequency of side effects development from 7.4 to 2.9%, and increased total 5-years survival from 66.1 to 79.3% [18].

Adsorption of endogenous toxins generated in intestines has a special value in the cases when barrier function of intestinal epithelium is attenuated, in particular upon cytostatic therapy. In such situation the presence of potent adsorbents in intestinal lumen prevents translocation of increased amounts of natural products of enteric metabolism (indols, phenols, scatol etc.), bacterial toxins, and intestinal microflora into bloodstream [5, 74]. Beneficial effects of enterosorption in acute intestinal infections is determined by a complex of factors: adsorption of bacterial toxins and inflammatory mediators, elimination of secretory diarrhea, total change of chemical composition of enteric content, suppression of pathogenic microflora growth [74, 81]. Also Enterosgel is capable to adsorb enteric bacteria on its surface and destruct some of them [79]. Enterosorbents decrease adhesion of microorganisms of the surface of intestinal mucosa and bacterial translocation [48]. Enterosorbent-bound microorganisms, toxins and metabolic products are removed from a body and therefore, enterosorption decreases LPS level [31, 101]. Prolonged administration of SUMS-1 enterosorbent promoted an increase in the number and height of microvillus in small bowel, activation of mitochondrial apparatus of enterocytes, and possibly total elevation of their adaptive potential [7]. So, enterosorption which is widely used in treatment of pathologies of gastro-intestinal tract and affects their various pathogenic moments, seems to be very perspective for treatment of gastroenteropathy which develops due to cytosta­tics application, and also for binding of anthracyclines excreted with the bile, because enterohepatic recirculation of the latest enhances their cytotoxic effect toward intestines and liver.

Taking into account the abovementioned role of LPO activation, proinflammatory cytokines, bacterial endotoxins in the development of cardiotoxic effects of anthracyclines, and in particular, DOX, as well as positive effects of enterosorbents in oncological clinics and experimental oncology, one could consider reasonable to include enterosorption into the schemes of anticancer therapy with the use anthracycline antibiotics for decrease of their system toxicity, first of all, cardiotoxicity.

Hemocarboperfusion which exhibits evident pa­rallels between mechanisms of its action and mechanisms of development of anthracycline cardiotoxicity, also looks to be prospective method of the treatment of immediate and late cardiac complications of anthracycline chemotherapy.


1. Andreychyn MA, Nikolayev VG, Yosyk YaI. Clinical and pathogenic grounding of enterosorption therapy in infectious diseases. Liky Ukr 2011; 5: 46–50 (In Ukrainian).
2. Ballet F, Vrignaud P, Robert J, et al. Hepatic extraction, metabolism and biliary excretion of doxorubicin in the isolated perfused rat liver. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1987; 19: 240–5.
3. Baranova OU, Volkova MA. The possibilities of mo­dern therapy of acute non lymphoblastic leukemia of adults. RMJ. Oncology 2001; 9: 999–1003 (in Russian).
4. Barrett-Lee PJ, Dixon JM, Farrell C, et al. Expert opinion on the use of anthracyclines in patients with advanced breast cancer at cardiac risk. Ann Oncol 2009; 20: 816–827.
5. Belyakov NA. Enterosorption. Centre of adsorptive therapy, Leningrad 1991; 336 p. (In Russian).
6. Benjamin WR, Tare NS, Hayes TJ, et al. Regulation of hemopoiesis in myelosuppressed mice by human recombinant IL–1 alpha. J Immunol 1989; 142: 792–9.
7. Bgatova NP. The ultrastructural organization of the epitheliocytes in the rat small intestine with the long-term use of the artificial carbon-mineral sorbent SUMS-1. Morphology 1998; 4: 81–4 (In Russian).
8. Bobbert P, Weithäuser A, Andres J, et al. Increased plasma retinol binding protein 4 levels in patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail 2009; 11: 1163–8.
9. Bonatskaya LV, Nikolaev VG, et al. Some results of applying of the enterosorption in case of neoplastic disease in the experiment. Modern electronics in biology and medicine. Kiev, 1984: 156–9 (in Russian).
10. Borodin YuI, Lyubarski MS, Narov YuE, et al. Correction of endotoxemia under some oncological diseases. Bull SO RAMN 2004; 2: 7–12 (in Russian).
11. Bryant J, Picot J, Baxter L, et al. Use of cardiac markers to assess the toxic effects of anthracyclines given to children with cancer: A systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2007; 43: 1959–66.
12. Cardinale D, Colombo A, Sandri MT, et al. Prevention of high-dose chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity in high-risk patients by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition. Circulation 2006; 114: 2474–81.
13. Chekman IS, Savchenkova LV, Gorchakova NA, et al. Liposomal forms of medical preparations: from experiment to clinic (review of literature and own data). J Acad Med Sci Ukr 2006; 4: 653–67 (In Ukrainian).
14. Chekman IS, Trofimova IA, Mazur IA, et al. The efficacy of Tiotriazoline in doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy. Zaporоzh Med J 2010; 5: 207–10 (In Ukrainian).
15. Cole MP, Chaiswing L, Oberley TD, et al. The protective roles of nitric oxide and superoxide dismutase in adriamycin-induced cardiotoxicity. Cardiovasc Res 2006; 69: 186–97.
16. Cowie MR, Jourdain P, Maisel A, et al. Clinical appli­cation of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) testing. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 1710–8.
17. Creutzig U, Diekamp S, Zimmermann M, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of early and late anthracycline cardiotoxicity in children with AML. Ped Blood Cancer 2007; 48: 651–62.
18. Datsun AI. Sorption/detoxification and singlet oxygen therapy as a means to optimize treatment schedules in resec­table rectal cancer. Oncologiya 2006; 4: 355–8 (In Ukrainian).
19. Dodd DA, Atkinson JB, Olson RD, et al. Doxorubicin cardiomyopathy is associated with a decrease in calcium release channel of the sarcoplasmic reticulum in a chronic rabbit model. J Clin Invest 1993; 91: 1697–705.
20. Doesch AO, Mueller S, Konstandin M, et al. Effects of protein A immunoadsorption on methylglyoxal levels in patients with chronic dilated cardiomyopathy and diabetes mellitus. Appl Cardiopulm Pathophysiol 2011; 15: 3–13.
21. Dolci A, Dominici R, Cardinale D, et al. Biochemical markers for prediction of chemotherapy–induced cardiotoxi­city. Systematic review of the literature and recommendations for use. Am J Clin Pathol 2008; 130: 688–95.
22. Fira LS, Volkov KS, Datsko TV, et al. Investigation of enterosgel influence on kidneys structure during prolong introduction and its effectiveness at experimental kidney insufficiency. Ukr J Nephrol Dialysis 2009; 2: 41–5 (in Ukrainian).
23. Fogli S, Nieri P, Breschi MC. The role of nitric oxide in anthracycline toxicity and prospects for pharmacologic prevention of cardiac damage. FASEB J 2004; 18: 664–75.
24. Fulbright JM, Huh W, Anderson P, et al. Can anthracycline therapy for pediatric malignancies be less cardiotoxic? Curr Oncol Rep 2010; 12: 411–9.
25. Gershanovich ML. Cardiotoxicity of antineoplastic anthracyclines antibiotics and possibilities of its prevention by cardioxane in oncological practice. Vopr Onkol 2001; 1: 23–9 (In Russian).
26. Goldberg ED, Dygai AM, Zhdanov VV. The mechanisms of blood system regulation under myelosuppressive influences. Bull Siberian Med 2002; 2: 154–71 (In Russian).
27. Goldberg ED, Novytsky VV. Antitumor anthracyclines antibiotics and blood system. Tomsk, 1986. 240 р. (In Russian).
28. Goormaghtigh E, Huart P, Praet M, et al. Structure of the doxorubicin–cardiolipin complex role in mitochondrial toxicity. Biophys Chem 1990; 35: 247–57.
29. Granger CB. Prediction and prevention of chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy. Can it be done? Circulation 2006; 114: 2432–3.
30. Grek OR, Mishenina SV, Pupyshev AB. Protective effect of enterosgel on rat liver lysosomes during cytostatic treatment. Bull Exp Biol Med Pharmacol Toxicol 2002; 4: 355–8.
31. Grigoriev AV, Kartel NT. Adhesion of pathogenic microflora on carbon sorbents. J Microbiol Epidemiol Immunol 1991; 7: 11–1 (In Russian).
32. Hellmann K. Cardioprotection by dexrazoxane (Cardio­xane; ICRF 187): progress in supportive care. Support Care Cancer 1996; 4: 305–7.
33. Herman DS, Lam L, Taylor MRG, et al. Truncations of titin causing dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 619–28.
34. Ho E, Brown A, Barrett P, et al. Subclinical anthracycline– and trastuzumab–induced cardiotoxicity in the long–term follow–up of asymptomatic breast cancer survivors: a speckle tracking echocardiographic study. Heart 2010; 96: 701–7.
35. Horacek JM, Pudil R, Jebavy L, еt al. Assessment of anthracycline–induced cardiotoxicity with biochemical markers. Exp Oncol 2007; 29: 309–13.
36. Horacek JM, Vasatova M, Tichy M, et al. The use of cardiac biomarkers in detection of cardiotoxicity associated with conventional and high-dose chemotherapy for acute leukemia. Exp Oncol 2010; 32: 97–9.
37. Hrdina R, Gersl V, Klimtova I, et al. Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 2000; 43: 75–82.
38. Huober J, Fett W, Nusch A, et al. A multicentric observational trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for metastatic breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2010; 10: 2.
39. Ivanova O, Mordyk A, Tatarintseva M. Polisorb in complex treatment of patients with infiltrative lung tuberculosis. Vrach 2010; 12:71–3 (In Russian).
40. Kalaiselvi P, Pragasam V, Chinnikrishnan S, et al. Counteracting adriamycin-induced oxidative stress by administration of N-acetyl cysteine and vitamin E. Clin Chem Lab Med 2005; 43: 834–40.
41. Kalinkina NV. Anthracycline cardiomyopathy. Ukr J Cardiol 2004; 2: (In Russian).
42. Kalinkina NV. Pathogenesis of anthracyclines heart injuries. Arch Clin Exp Med 1999; 8: 100–3 (In Russian).
43. Kalyuzhin VV, Teplyakov AT, Vechersky YuYu, et al. Pathogenesis of chronic heart failure: change of dominating paradigm. Bull Siberian Med 2007; 4: 71–9 (In Russian).
44. Kapustian LM, Rozhko OT, Bobyk VI, et al. Investigation of HSP60 gene expression in mRNA level in heart at dilated cardiomyopathy. Biopolymers Cell 2009; 25: 73–6 (in Ukrainian).
45. Kim S-Y, Kim S-J, Kim B-J, et al. Doxorubicin-induced oxygen species generation and intracellular Ca2+ increase are reciprocally modulated in rat cardiomyocytes. Exp Mol Med 2006; 38: 535–45.
46. Kolpakova TA, Kolpakova MA, Bashkirova UV, et al. The influence of enterosorbent SUMS-1 on pharmacokinetic of isoniazid and lipid peroxidation in patients with lung tuberculosis and drug-induced liver injury. Probl Tuberkul 2001; 3: 34–6 (In Russian).
47. Krack A, Sharma R, Figulla HR, et al. The importance of the gastrointestinal system in the pathogenesis of heart failure. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 2368–74.
48. Kramarev SO, Dmitrieva OA. Enterosorption in acute intestinal infections in children. Zdorovje Rebenka 2011; 2: 77–80 (In Ukrainian).
49. Kuzuya M, Kuzuya F. Probucol as an antioxidant and antiatherogenic drug. Free Radic Biol Med 1993; 14: 67–77.
50. Ky B, Carver JR. Biomarker approach to the detection and cardioprotective strategies during anthracycline chemotherapy. Heart Failure Clin 2011; 7: 323–31.
51. Le Bras M, Clément MV, Pervaiz S, et al. Reactive oxygen species and the mitochondrial signaling pathway of cell death. Histol Histopathol 2005; 20: 205–20.
52. L’Ecuyer T, Sanjeev S, Thomas R, et al. DNA damage is an early event in doxorubicin-induced cardiac myocyte death. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006; 291: H1273–80.
53. Li K, Sung RY, Huang WZ, et al. Thrombopoietin protects against in vitro and in vivo cardiotoxicity induced by doxorubicin. Circulation 2006; 113: 2211–20.
54. Li L, Takemura G, Li Y, et al. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor improves left ventricular function of doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy. Lab Invest 2007; 87: 440–55.
55. Li L, Takemura G, Li Y, et al. Preventive effect of erythropoietin on cardiac dysfunction in doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2006; 113: 535–43.
56. Lien Y-C, Lin S-M, Nithipongvanitch R, et al. TNF receptor deficiency exacerbated adriamycin-induced cardiomyocytes apoptosis: an insight into the Fas connection. Mol Cancer Ther 2006; 5: 261–9.
57. Lipshultz SE, Scully RE, Lipsitz SR, et al. Assessment of dexrazoxane as a cardioprotectant in doxorubicin-treated children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: long-term follow-up of a prospective, randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11: 950–61.
58. Ludke AR, Al-Shudiefat AA, Dhingra S, et al. A concise description of cardioprotective strategies in doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2009; 87: 756–63.
59. Manda G, Nechifor MT, Neagu T-M. Reactive oxygen species, cancer and anti-cancer therapies. Current Chem Biol 2009; 3: 342–66.
60. Markelova EV, Kostyushko AV, Krasnikov VE. Pathogenetic role of the in cytokine system changes at infectious and inflammatory diseases. Pacific Med J 2008; 3: 24–9 (In Russian).
61. Masson S, Latini R, Anand IS, et al. The prognostic value of big endothelin-1 in more than 2.300 patients with heart failure enrolled in the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT). J Card Fail 2006; 12: 375–80.
62. Matyash MG, Kravchuk TL, Vysotskaya VV, et al. Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: mechanisms of development and clinical manifestations. Siberian J Oncol 2008; 6 : 66–75 (In Russian).
63. Mechado V, Cabral A, Monteiro P, et al. Carvediol as a protector against the cardiotoxicity induced by anthracyclines (doxorubicin). Rev Port Cardiol 2008; 27: 1277–96.
64. Melnykov OF, Zabrodska LV, Tymchenko MD, et al. Applying methods of clinical immunology and allergology to the research of enterosgel efficacy in treatment of patients with food allergy. Liky Ukrainy 2011; 3: 70–2 (In Russian).
65. Miettinen KH, Lassus J, Harjola V-P, et al. Prognostic role of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and their polymorphisms in acute decompensated heart failure. Eur J Heart Failure 2008; 10: 396–403.
66. Minotti G, Cairo G, Monti E. Role of iron in anthracycline cardiotoxicity: new tunes for an old song? FASEB J 1999; 13: 199–212.
67. Minotti G, Menna P, Salvatorelli E, et al. Anthracyclines: molecular advances and pharmacologic developments in antitumor activity and cardiotoxicity. Pharmacol Rev 2004; 56: 185–229.
68. Mokhort NA, Seredinskaya NN, Kirichok LM. Cardiotoxic effects of doxorubicin and expediency of its pharmacological correction by dihydropyridinic line calcium antagonists and by guanidine line ATF-sensitive potassium canals activators. Pharmacol Pharmaceut Toxicol 2010; 4: 35–44 (In Ukrainian).
69. Mokhort NA, Sachok VV. Influence of calcium antagonist of the third-generation of dimeodipine on glycolysis in experimental doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy. Pharmacol Pharmaceut Toxicol 2010; 3: 47–50 (In Ukrainian).
70. Montaigne D, Marechal X, Preau S, et al. Doxorubicin induces mitochondrial permeability transition and contractile dysfunction in the human myocardium. Mitochondrion 2011; 11: 22–6.
71. Neilan TG, Jassal DS, Scully MF, et al. Iloprost attenuates doxorubicin-induced cardiac injury in a murine model without compromising tumor suppression. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 1251–6.
72. Newman RA, Hacker MP, Krakoff IH. Amelioration of adriamycin and daunorubicin myocardial toxicity by adenosine. Cancer Res 1981; 41: 3483–8.
73. Nicolay K, van der Neut R, Fok JJ, et al. Effects of adriamycin on lipid polymorphism in cardiolipin-containing model and mitochondrial membranes. 1985; 819: 55–65.
74. Nikolaev VG, Mikhalovsky SV, Gurina NM. Modern enterosorbents and mechanisms of their action. Efferent Therapy 2005; 4: 3–17 (In Russian)
75. Nikolaev VG, Ryabov SI, Pyrig LA, et al. Unconventional methods of activated charcoal application in chronic renal disease therapy. Nefrologia Mexicana 1985; 6: 148.
76. Nikolaev VG, Sakhno LA, Snezhkova EA, et al. Carbon adsorbents in oncology: achievements and perspectives. Exp Oncol 2011; 33: 2–8.
77. Nikolaev VG, Strelko VV, Korovin UF, et al. Theoretical basis and practical application of enterosorption technique. In: Sorption methods of detoxication and immunocorrection in medicine. Kharkov 1982; 112–4 (In Russian).
78. Nikolaev VG. Enterosgel. K.: Bogdana, 2009: 159 p. (In Russian).
79. Nikolaeva LG, Grigoriev AV, Znamensky VA, et al. Experimental studying of enterosobent’s efficacy in salmonellosis. J Microbiol Epidemiol Immunobiol 1994; 2: 7–11 (In Russian).
80. Nikula TD, Bondur VV, Pluzhnik EG. Effects of the carbon enterosorbent SKN on clinical and laboratory indices in patients with chronic circulatory insufficiency. Lik Sprava 1996; 7–9: 106–9 (in Russian).
81. Novokhshonov AA, Sokolova NV. Clinical efficacy of etiopathogenic therapy by enterosorbents of acute intestinal infections in children. Consilium medicum. Pediatry 2009; 1: 38–43 (In Russian).
82. O’Brien PJ. Cardiac troponin is the most effective translational safety biomarker for myocardial injury in cardiotoxicity. Toxicology 2008; 245: 206–18.
83. Ogawa Y, Kondo T, Sugiyama S. Role of phospholipase in the genesis of doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy in rats. Cancer Res 1987; 47: 1239–43.
84. Ohya T, Egusa G. Mechanisms of anti-atherogenic action of probucol. Nihon Rinsho 1999; 57: 2831–6.
85. Okhotnikova OM, Gladush UI, Ivanova TI, et al. Application of enterosorbent “White carbons” in children with allergic disease: results of own researches. Modern Pediatry 2009; 4: 39–44 (In Russian).
86. Oleshchuk AM, Nikolaeva VV, Klishch IN, et al. Effectiveness of enterosgel in pharmaceutical form paste for per oral usage in case of iatrogenic intoxication by antituberculosis agents. Ukr J Clin Lab Med 2009; 4: 95–9 (In Russian).
87. Osadchaya OI. The role of enterosorption in treatment of metabolic intoxication in patients with severe burns. Liky Ukr 2008; 7: 56–8 (In Russian).
88. Osadchaya ОI, Boyarskaya АМ, Sheyman BS, et al. The influence of enterosorption on the content of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in severe thermal trauma. Urgent Med 2008; 3: 74–6 (In Russian).
89. Pai VB, Nahata MC. Cardiotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents: incidence, treatment and prevention. Drug Safety 2000; 22: 263–302.
90. Paliy IG, Reznichenko IG. Application of enterosgel in complex therapy of diseases with skin allergic symptoms (short review of literature). News Med Pharm 2005; 7: 6 (In Russian).
91. Papoian T, Lewis W. Rapid Communication. Adriamycin cardiotoxicity in vivo. Selective alterations in rat cardiac mRNAs. Am J Pathol 1990; 36: 1201–7.
92. Ponomarova OV, Pivnyuk VM, Nosko MM, et al. Prophylaxis by coal enterosorbent of acute and extended emethogenic toxicity of cancer patient chemotherapy. Oncologiya 2008; 3: 370–3 (In Ukrainian).
93. Posokhova КА, Shevchuk ОО, Pryshlyak AM, et al. The effectiveness of glutargin and enterosgel in liver injury caused by antituberculosis drugs. Med Chemistry 2010; 3: 61–5 (In Ukrainian).
94. Potemski P, Polakowski P, Wiktorowska-Owczarek AK, et al. Amifostine improves hemodynamic parameters in doxorubicin-pretreated rabbits. Pharmacol Rep 2006; 56: 966–72.
95. Pousset F, Isnard R, Lechat P, et al. Prognostic value of plasma endothelin-1 in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 254–8.
96. Pyanova LG, Likholobov VA, Dolgikh TI, et al. Studying of the sorption of cytokines on a surface of the modified carbon sorbent. Efferent Therapy 2010; 1: 16–9 (In Russian).
97. Rahman AM, Yusuf SW, Ewer MS. Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity and the cardiac-sparing effect of liposomal formulation Int J Nanomedicine 2007; 2: 567–83.
98. Ratnikova LI, Permitina AN, Popilov AN. Clinical and biochemical effectiveness of “Polisorb” in toxic hepatitis. Terra Medica 2007; 2: 16–9 (In Russian).
99. Reznikova EA, Kosenok VK, Nechaeva GI, et al. The influence of Reamberin on cardiotoxicity of anthracyclines in case of locally advanced breast cancer. North-Vestern St. Petersburg I.I. Mechnikov State Med Acad 2004; 4: 123–6 (In Russian).
100. Sakhno LA, Nikolaev VG. Adsorptive methods in oncology. Oncologiya 1999; 3: 165–75 (in Russian).
101. Sakhno LA, Sarnatskaya VV, Maslenny VN, et al. Comparative evaluation of capability of different nature enterosorbents to bind bacterial endotoxins. Rep Nat Acad Sci Ukr 2009; 2: 168–72 (In Russian).
102. Samura BB. Myocardial injury induced by anthracyclines. Diagnosis and treatment. Therapia. Ukr Med Visnyk 2008; 12: 46–52 (In Russian).
103. Santhosh S, Sini ТК, Anandan R, et al. Hepatoprotective activity of chitosanagainst isoniazid and rifampicin-induced toxicity in experimental rats. Eur J Pharmacol 2007; 572: 69–73.
104. Sayed-Ahmed MM, Khattab MM, Gad MZ, et al. Increased plasma endotelin-1 and cardiac nitric oxide during doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy. Pharmacol Toxicol 2001; 89: 140–4.
105. Shalimov SA, Litvinenko AA, Dudnichenko AS, et al. Treatment of experimental tumorous forms with antibiotics of anthracycline group in the liposomal form. Ukr Chemother J 2004; 1–2: 65–8 (In Russian).
106. Sharma H, Pathan RA, Kumar V, et al. Anti-apoptotic potential of rosuvastatin pretreatment in murine model of cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol 2010; 150: 193–200.
107. Sharma R, Al-Nasser FO, Anker SD. The importance of tumor necrosis factor and lipoproteins in the pathogenesis of chronic heart failure. Heart Fail Monit 2001; 2: 42–7.
108. Shcherbakov PL. Enterosorbent application in treatment of intestine disbiosys Exp Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 3: 88–92 (In Russian).
109. Shevchuk AB, Nikolaev VG, Evseeva YA, et al. Enterosorption in clinic of allergic diseases. In: Modelling, medicotechnical and mathematic provision of therapeutic diagnostic process. Kharkov, 1983: 277–8 (In Russian).
110. Silber JH, Cnaan A, Clark BJ, et al. Enalapril to prevent cardiac function decline in long-term survivors of paediatric cancer exposed to anthracyclines. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 820–8.
111. Simunek T, Stirba M, Popelova O, et al. Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: Overview of studies examining the roles of oxidative stress and free cellular iron. Pharmacol Rep 2009; 61: 154–71.
112. Sinha BS, Trush MA, Kennedy KA, et al. Enzymatic activation and binding of adriamycin to nuclear DNA. Cancer Res 1984; 44: 2892–6.
113. Skovsgaard T, Nielsen SL. Functional monitoring of anthracycline cardiotoxicity: a prospective, blinded, long-term observational study of outcome in 120 patients. Ann Oncol 2002; 13: 699–709.
114. Sochenko DG, Fokin AA, Vazhenin AV, et al. Endomiocardial biopsy: the first experience. Siberian J Oncol 2007; 3: 94–6 (In Russian).
115. Sukhov UA, Gebesh VV. The influence of enterosorption on the content of proinflammatory cytokines in intestinal infection and measles. Clin Immunol 2007; 1: 24–33 (In Russian).
116. Swift L, McHowat J, Sarvazyan N. Inhibition of membrane-associated calcium-independent Phospholipase A2 as a potential culprit of anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 5992–8.
117. Thorburn A, Frankel AE. Apoptosis and anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Mol Cancer Ther 2006; 5: 197–9.
118. Trachtenberg BH, Landy DC, Franco VI, et al. Anthracycline-Associated Cardiotoxicity in Survivors of Childhood Cancer. Pediatr Cardiol 2011; 32: 342–53.
119. Treschalin ID, Pereverzeva ER, Bodyagin DA, et al. Comparative experimental toxicological study of doxorubicin and its nanoparticle formulations. Russ Biother J 2008; 3: 24–33 (In Russian).
120. Uchajkin VF, Novokshonov AA, Sokolova NV, et al. The place and importance in the enterosorption etiopathogenetic therapy of acute intestinal infections in children. Pediatry 2007; 2: 4–50 (In Russian).
121. van Acker SA, Boven E, Kuiper K, et al. Monohydroxyethylrutoside, a dose-dependent cardioprotective agent, does not affect the antitumor activity of doxorubicin. Clin Cancer Res 1997; 3: 1747–54.
122. Vatutin NT, Keting EV, Kalinkina NV, et al. Influence of verapamil and propranolol on silent myocardial ischemia caused by application of high doses of anthracycline antibiotics. Ukr Med Almanac 2001; 1: 32–5 (In Russian).
123. Vedam K, Nishijima Y, Druhan LJ, et al. Role of heart shock factor-1 activation in the doxorubicin-induced heart failure in mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2010; 298: 1832–41.
124. Vengerovsky AI, Golovina EL, Chuchalin VS, et al. The therapeutic effectiveness of enterosorbents in experimental toxic hepatitis. Efferent Therapy 2000; 1: 47–50 (In Russian).
125. Viktorov AP, Matveeva EV. The modern antineoplastic drugs: problems of safety. Health Ukr 2010; 26–8 (In Russian).
126. Volkov VI, Serik SA. Immunoinflammation and heart failure (review of literature and own data). J Acad Med Sci Ukr 2008; 2: 248–67 (In Russian).
127. Vozianova ZhI. Enterosorption in complex treatment of patients with viral hepatitis. Vrachebnoe Delo 1990; 4: 117–20 (In Russian).
128. Wakasugi S. Drug-induced myocardial disease — adriamycin cardiotoxicity. Nippon Rinsho 2000; 58: 204–11.
129. Wallace K, Hausner E, Herman E, et al. Serum troponins as biomarkers of drug-induced cardiac toxicity. Toxicocol Pathol 2004; 32: 106–21.
130. Weiss RB. The anthracyclines: will we ever find a better doxorubicin? Semin Oncol 1992; 19: 670–86.
131. Xu X, Persson HL, Richardson DR. Molecular pharmacology of the interaction of anthracyclines with iron. Mol Pharmacol 2005; 68: 261–71.
132. Zambetti M, Moliterni A, Materazzo C, et al. Long-term cardiac sequelae in operable breast cancer patients given adjuvant chemotherapy with or without doxorubicin and breast irradiation. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 37–43.
133. Zeidan Q, Strauss M, Porras N, et al. Differential long-term subcellular responses in heart and liver to Adriamycin stress. Exogenous L-carnitine cardiac and hepatic protection. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol 2002; 34: 315–21.

No Comments » Add comments
Leave a comment

ERROR: si-captcha.php plugin says GD image support not detected in PHP!

Contact your web host and ask them why GD image support is not enabled for PHP.

ERROR: si-captcha.php plugin says imagepng function not detected in PHP!

Contact your web host and ask them why imagepng function is not enabled for PHP.