Polymorphisms of MTHFR and MTR genes are not related to susceptibility to childhood ALL in north India

Nikbakht M.1, MalekZadeh K.2, Kumar Jha A.1, Askari M.1, Marwaha R.K.1, Kaul D.3, Kaur J.1

Summary. Background:Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most worldwide common type of childhood cancer. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase (MTR) participate in folate pathways and are known as critical factors for DNA integrity as well as DNA hypomethylation. The aim of this work is to investigate frequency of MTHFR (677C→T and 1298A→C) and MTR (2756A→G) polymorphisms and their interaction with respect to possible effect on risk of childhood ALL among North Indian population. Procedure: A case control study from has been conducted on bone marrow and peripheral blood samples from 125 ALL patients and 100 sex-age matched healthy controls using PCR-RFLP method. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed for different genotypes between patients and controls (p>0.05). Significant difference for the risk of ALL in individuals having genotype of MTHFR 677TT (OR=0.61, 95% CI=0.21–1.77) and MTHFR 1298CC (OR=0.56, 95% CI=0.18–1.68) was not observed. The correlation of SNP of MTR gene and risk of ALL was not observed, too. Conclusions: The differences in distribution of possible combined genotypes of MTHFR (677C→T, 1298A→C) and MTR (2756A→G) between ALL patients and controls were statistically insignificant.

Received: September 4, 2011.
*Correspondence: E-mails: mohsnik2003@yahoo.com;
Abbreviations used: ALL — acute lymphoblastic leukemia; MTHFR — methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase; MTR — 5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a malignant neoplasm of hematopoietic stem cells, which is the most common cancer among children with a peak incidence in 4–5 years of age [1]. It accounts for 23% of childhood cancers (children younger than 15 years) [2]. It is still the most common malignant disorder in childhood and principal cause of death due to disease in the pediatric age group, especially prevalent in males [3]. Interaction of genetic and environmental factors together may enhance the risk of leukemogenesis [3, 4].

Folate metabolism plays crucial role in cellular functioning and it serves as donor of one carbon for the synthesis of purines and pyrimidines which are used for the synthesis of RNA and DNA [3, 5–7]. Normal metabolism of folate might be affected by imbalance of nutrition, cellular transport interruption and mutation in folate-related genes. Several mutations in folate-related gene sequences have been reported. However, the effect of these mutations on folate related genes still is unclear [3, 4]. Deficiency of folate or non-homogenous distribution of folate vitamins may influence the risk of cancer by misincorporation of uracil into DNA and leading to double-strand breaks and chromosomal damage, DNA hypomethylation/demethylation of some tumor suppressor genes by which it modulate the leukemogenesis [8–11].

The methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene is located on chromosome 1p36 [12] and translated to enzyme which catalyzes the reduction of 5, 10-methylenetetrahydrofolate to 5-methyltetrahydrofolate. 5-methyltetrahydrofolate acts as a carbon donor for de novo methionine synthesis and DNA methylation [13–15]. MTHFR influences the process of DNA methylation and distribution of uridylates and thymidylates bases for DNA synthesis and repair. Therefore due to its role in folate pathways, it makes the MTHFR an important candidate for study of cancer predisposing gene [12, 15–17]. Two frequently reported and well-studied mutations in sequence of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene are (MTHFR 677C→T and 1298A→C) which reduce the activity of encoded enzyme [16, 17]. The folate used for synthesis of purine and pyrimidine is accumulated in the form of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (the most abundant form in wild-type MTHFR 677 CC subjects) [18, 19].

5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase (MTR) gene is located on 1q43. It is the enzyme which catalyzes the transfer of methyl base from 5-methyl THF to homocysteine [20]. It is reported to have a polymorphism in locus 2756 (A→G i.e. glycine→aspartic acid), resulting in reduced enzyme activity and it is considered as a prime cause for elevation of homocysteine and subsequently DNA hypomethylation [20, 21],

Several reports have indicated that substitutions of C→T at locus 677, A→C at locus 1298 of MTHFR gene and A→G at locus 2567 of MTR gene reduce the enzyme activity and result in hypomethylation of DNA and subsequently reduced incidence of DNA double-strand breakage [21]. Hence, the study of these SNPs can rationally assist to determine the risk of group to ALL and also can be used for study of development and progression of childhood ALL in the population study. The aim of this work is to investigate frequency of MTHFR and MTR polymorphisms and their interaction with respect to possible effect on risk of childhood ALL among North Indian population.


Specimens. Total 125 bone marrow aspirates were collected from the patients at initial time of diagnosis and prior to any treatment during admission to Hemato-oncology ward (2007–2009), Advanced Pediatric Center, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. Informed consent was obtained from all patients in accordance with the institutional guidelines and the declaration of PGIMER. The ethical committees of PGIMER approved the protocol.

Diagnosis was based on morphological, cytogenetic and immunophenotypic criteria of WHO classification [39] by Department of Hematology, PGIMER. The clinical characteristic of the ALL patients are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Demography of study
Variable Patients Controls
Male 97 (77.6%) 77 (77%)
Female 28 (22.4%) 23 (23%)
Mean (±SD) 6.46 (±3.34) 6.55 (±3.37)
Range 1—14
Age group
<2 years 12 (9.6%) 11 (11%)
2–5 years 43 (34.4%) 33 (33%)
>5 years 70 (56%) 56 (56%)
NCI Risk group
Standard 103 (82.4%) -
High 22 (17.6%) -

Control samples (n=100) were obtained from blood of healthy donors with respect of median and mean of age and sex of patients. The mononuclear cell fraction was separated from bone marrow aspirate and blood by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation (Ficoll Hystopaqu, Sigma Aldrich, USA) and was used for DNA isolation. All samples contained at least 40% blast cells.

DNA isolation. DNA was extracted from mononuclear cells of bone marrow and blood by standard proteinase K digestion followed by phenol-chloroform method [27]. DNA quantity and quality was determined by spectrophotometry via measuring the optical density at 260 nm and 280 nm of the prepared diluted DNA (1 OD at 260 nm unit =50 µg/mL) and 260 nm/280 nm.

Detection of MTHFR 677CT, 1298AC and MTR 2756 A→G SNPs. Genomic DNA containing the polymorphic sites was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with specific primers for each gene (Table 2) using 15 ng genomic DNA, 0.5 µM of each of the primers, 100 µM deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs), 10 mM Tris (tris-(hydroxymethyl) aminomethane)–HCl (pH 8.3), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, and 0.5 units of Taq polymerase (Sigma–Aldrich, USA) in a total volume of 50 µl.

The PCR conditions were as mentioned in Table 2. RFLP was performed with restriction enzymes according to the manufacturer’s instructions (MBI, Fermentas, Burlington, ON, Canada). The restriction digestion was visualized after electrophoresis on 2.5% agarose gel. The amplified PCR product of MTHFR 677CT, digested by HinfI restriction enzyme. Those patients carrying genotype CC showed a single band of 198 bp, whereas carrier of genotype TT showed bands of 175 and 23 bp, and three bands of 198, 175 and 23bp appeared with genotype CT. After digesting with MboII for detecting MTHFR 1298A→C, the bands 56, 31, 30, 28 and 18 bp were observed for genotype AA, whereas, the expected bands for genotype CC were 84, 31, 30 and 18 bp and for heterozygous (AC), the size of expected bands were 84, 56, 31, 30, 28 and 18 bp. The amplified product of MTR 2756A→G gene followed by digestion by HaeIII, the carrier of genotype AA showed the single band at 211 bp. Those homozygous for mutation (GG) showed bands of 131 and 80bp. Heterozygous (AG) represented bands of 211, 131 and 80 bp.

Table 2. Primer sequences and PCR Conditions
Gene Primer Sequence (5’- 3’) Annealing temp. (°C) / time / cycle
F TGA AGG AGA AGG TGT CTG CGG GA 59 / 1 min / 35

Statistical analysis. Distribution of MTHFR 677CT and MTHFR 1298AC and MTR 2756A→G va­riants among patients and controls were tabulated for cases and controls (Table 3). With respect to assumption which indicates that MTHFR and MTR genotypes may be associated with the risk of ALL, we tested genotypes interaction in models for acute lymphoblastic leukemia and the interaction of these genes with age, sex and hematological classification, risk group. The χ2 test was used to examine differences in frequencies between MTHFR 677CT, MTHFR 1298AC and MTR 2756A→G genotypes in cases and controls. Fisher exact test was used when cell numbers were less than 5. The relationship between MTHFR and MTR genotypes and risk of ALL was assessed by means of the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). It was calculated using both conditional and unconditional logistic regression (adjusting for age and sex) by use of software version 11.5 (SPSSs, Chicago, IC), and EPI software version 3.2.

Table 3. Frequencies of MTHFR 677C→→T, 1298A→→C and MTR 2756A→→G geno­types in case and control
Genotype Patients (n = 125) Controls (n = 100) OR CI (95%) P-Value
CC 54 (43.2%) 40 (40%) 1
CT 62 (49.6%) 49 (49%) 0.94 0.52–1.69 0.93
TT 9 (7.2%) 11 (11%) 0.61 0.21–1.77 0.30
CT+TT 71 (56.8%) 60 (60%) 0.88 0.50–1.55 0.72
AA 52 (41.6%) 40 (40%) 1
AC 65 (52%) 49 (49%) 1.02 0.56–1.85 0.94
CC 8 (6.4%) 11 (11%) 0.56 0.18–1.68 0.37
AC+CC 73 (58.4%) 60 (60%) 0.94 0.53–1.66 0.91
MTR A2756G
AA 74 (59.2%) 58 (58%) 1
AG 44 (35.2%) 35 (35%) 0.99 0.54–1.80 0.92
GG 7 (5.6%) 7 (7%) 0.78 0.23–2.66 0.87
AG+GG 51 (40.8%) 42 (42%) 0.95 0.54–1.68 0.96


Demographic data of cases and controls has been summarized in Table 1. The variables have also been categorized for ALL immunophenotypes. The blast lineage, NCI risk groups of ALL patients have been tabulated in Table 1. 94.4% patients were diagnosed with B-lineage ALL and 5.6% with T-lineage ALL. The distribution of ALL patients on the basis of NCI risk groups were 82.4% in standard risk group and 17.6% in high risk group.

The mean age (±SD) of all cases and controls were 6.46 (±3.34) and 6.55 (±3.37) years (p=0.245) respectively. Around 9.6% of patients were in the age-group of age ≤2 years and 34.4% were in the age-group of 2< age ≤ 5 and 56% were in age of more than 5 years, whereas it was 11, 33 and 56% respectively for healthy controls. The number of males and females among cases and controls were almost similar (77.6: 77 for males and 22.4: 23 for females, respectively). The distribution pattern of ALL patients and controls according to place of living were divided in to two groups (a) urban (b) rural. 35.2% of patients were living in urban and 64.8% were living in rural areas. The values for controls were not different from cases (38% urban and 62% rural). The distribution of ALL cases and controls among different states of North India showed the most of the patients in present study were from Punjab (44%), followed by Haryana (27.2%), Uttar Pradesh (12.8%), Himachal Pradesh (8%), Chandigarh (4.0%) and J&K (4%). Similar distribution was seen among the controls.

The prevalence of genotypes of MTHFR and MTR genes in patients and controls were depicted in Table 3. There is no significant differences between patients and controls in this study population.The frequencies of MTHFR C677T/A, MTHFR A1298C, MTR A2756G variants in childhood ALL and healthy controls did not deviate significantly from the Hardy — Weinberg equilibrium. Interestingly, all genotypes of MTHFR 677TT, MTHFR 1298CC and MTR 2756GG show slight decreasing of the risk disease, but no significant difference (p>0.05) was observed between patients and controls in all these studied genes.

The frequencies of MTHFR 677CT, MTHFR 1298AC and MTR 2756A→G in stratified risk group is shown in Table 4. Significant difference of distribution of genotypes between standard and high risk group was not observed.

Table 4. Frequencies of genotypes in standard and high risk group patients
Genotype Standard Risk Group103 (%) High Risk Group22 (%) OR CI (95%) P-Value
CC 45 (43.7) 11 (50) Ref. - -
CT 51 (49.5) 9 (40.9) 1.39 0.48–4.05 0.67
TT 7 (6.7) 2 (9) 0.97 0.67–1.04 1
CT+TT 58 (56.3) 11 (50) 1.29 0.47–3.65 0.76
AA 43 (41.7) 9 (41) Ref. - -
AC 53 (51.4) 11 (50) 1.01 0.34–2.93 0.81
CC 7 (6.7) 1 (4.5) 1.06 0.79–1.41 1
AC+CC 60 (58.2) 12 (54.5) 1.05 0.37–2.97 0.88
MTR A2756G
AA 60 (58.2) 14 (63.6) Ref. - -
AG 38 (36.9) 7 (31.8) 1.27 0.43–3.85 0.82
GG 5 (4.8) 1 (4.5) 1.03 0.71–1.49 1
AG+GG 43 (41.7) 8 (36.3) 1.25 0.44–3.62 0.82

The comparison of the frequency distribution of MTHFR 677CT, MTHFR 1298AC and MTR 2756A→G polymorphisms between case and control on the bases of sex showed that the distribution of MTHFR 677 and MTHFR 1298 and MTR2756 variants among the both sex were not significantly different (p>0.05). Also on the basis of age-group (the age of the children at the time of diagnosis), distribution of genotypes of MTHFR 677CT, MTHFR 1298AC and MTR 2756A→G were calculated. However, no significant difference was detected (Table 5).

Table 5. Frequencies of genotypes in different age groups
Age <2 2 < Age < 5 Age > 5
Genotype Patients(n=12) (%) Controls(n=11) (%) OR CI (95%) P-Value Patients(n=45)(%) Controls(n=32)(%) OR CI (95%) P-Va­lue Patient68 (%) Control57 (%) OR CI (95%) P-Va­lue
CC 6 (50) 4 (36.3) - - - 19 (42.2) 14 (43.7) - - - 29 (42.6) 22 (38.5) - - -
CT 5 (41.6) 6 (54.5) 0.76 0.33–1.72 0.6 23 (51.1) 16 (50) 1.06 0.37–1.52 0.9 34 (50) 25 (43.8) 1.03 0.45–2.36 0.91
TT 1 (8.3) 1 (9) 0.83 0.19–3.64 1 3 (6.6) 4 (12.5) 0.74 0.3–1.84 0.67 5 (7.3) 7 (12.2) 0.73 0.36–1.49 0.52
CT+TT 6 (50) 7 (63.6) 0.77 0.34–1.67 0.68 26 (57.7) 20 (62.5) 0.96 0.35–2.6 0.89 39 (57.3) 32 (56.1) 0.95 0.43–2.11 0.95
AA 5 (41.6) 4 (36.3) - - - 17 (37.7) 12 (37.5) - - - 30 (44.1) 24 (42.1) - - -
AC 7 (58.3) 5 (45.4) 1.05 0.49–2.23 1 24 (53.3) 17 (53.1) 1 0.34–2.29 0.81 34 (50) 27 (47.3) 1.01 0.45–2.25 0.86
CC 1 (8.3) 1 (9) 0.90 0.20–4.05 1 3 (6.6) 3 (9.3) 0.85 0.36–2.01 1 4 (5.8) 7 (12.2) 0.65 0.29–1.48 0.40
AC+CC 8 (66.6) 6 (54.5) 1.03 0.49–2.16 1 27 (60) 20 (62.5) 0.95 0.34–2.70 0.88 38 (55.8) 34 (59.6) 0.89 0.41–1.93 0.89
MTR A2756G
AA 7 (58.3) 6 (54.5) - - - 28 (62.2) 20 (62.5) - - - 39 (57.3) 32 (56.1) - - -
AG 4 (33.3) 4 (36.3) 0.93 0.39–2.19 1 16 (35.5) 11 (34.3) 1.04 0.36–3.02 0.86 24 (35.2) 19 (33.3) 1.02 0.72–1.43 0.91
GG 0 (0) 0 (0) - - - 2 (4.4) 2 (6.2) 0.86 0.31–2.35 1 5 (7.3) 5 (8.7) 0.91 0.47–1.75 1
AG+GG 4 (33.3) 4 (36.3) 0.93 0.39–2.19 1 18 (40) 13 (40.6) 1 0.68–1.46 0.83 29 (42.6) 24 (42.1) 0.99 0.46–2.16 0.87

The effect of gene-gene interaction between MTHFR polymorphisms on susceptibility of childhood ALL was investigated further; significant association between the interaction of MTHFR variants and development and progression of ALL among the children in the present study was on observed (Table 6).

As it is shown in Table 3, individuals who carried the genotype of MTHFR 677TT, did not show and difference on risk of ALL (OR=0.61; 95% CI=0.21–1.77). The adjusted OR for carriers of MTHFR 1298CC genotype was calculated. It was 0.56 (95% CI=0.18–1.68) which statistically did not show significance reduction on susceptibility against of childhood ALL. Moreover, this trace was not observed for variants of 2756A→G gene. The significance was not altered when these 3 polymorphisms were evaluated in combination (Table 7).

Table 6. Interaction of MTHFR genotypes between case and control
Combined geno­types Patients(n = 125) Controls(n = 100) OR CI (95%) P-Value
677CC/1298AA 22(17.6%) 16 (16%) - - -
677CT/1298AA 40 (32%) 20 (20%) 0.52 0.1–1.54 0.18
677TT/1298AA 8 (17.6%) 12 (12%) 1.35 0.34–5.47 0.63
677CC/1298AC 20 (6.4%) 22 (22%) 0.51 0.17–1.48 0.16
677CT/1298AC 17(13.6%) 18 (18%) 0.49 0.16–1.5 0.16
677TT/1298AC 0 (0%) 0 (0%) NA NA NA
677CC/1298CC 13(10.4%) 12 (12%) 0.73 0.2–2.55 0.57
677CT/1298CC 5 (4%) 7 (7%) 0.72 0.35–1.48 0.51
677TT/1298CC 0 (0%) 0 (0%) NA NA NA
Table 7. Frequencies of combined genotype in childhood ALL and control. Genotype is in respect of MTHFR 77C→→T,1298A→→C and MTR 2756A→→G
Combined geno­types Patients(n = 125) Controls(n = 100) OR CI (95%) P-Value
CCAAAA 14 7 Ref. - -
CCAAAG 6 5 0.82 0.44–1.52 0.70
CCAAGG 5 4 0.83 0.43–1.61 0.68
CCACAA 15 8 0.98 0.64–1.50 0.82
CCACAG 12 7 0.86 0.19–3.81 0.92
CCCCAA 2 2 0.75 0.27–2.09 0.60
CCCCAG 2 1 1 0.43–2.35 1
CTAAAA 18 9 1 0.25–3.97 1
CTAAAG 8 1 1.33 0.91–1.95 0.37
CTAAGG 2 1 1 0.43–2.35 1
CTACAA 15 10 1.33 0.34–5.32 0.64
CTACAG 13 5 0.77 0.16–3.71 0.7


Polymorphism of genes which regulate the metabolism of folate is the important phenomenon which may play role in cancer susceptibility by decreasing folate status or by interference in distribution of folate in cells could influence the risk of ALL [22]. Childhood ALL is more prone to environmental exposures during fetal and infant stage [10]. Reduction in the level of 5, 10-methylene–THF (MTHFR substrate), which is essential for synthesis of thymidylate, could lead to uracil misincorporation into DNA [23] and further diminished the DNA repair system and increased the susceptibility to double-strand breakage there by leading to the chromosomal damage and translocation [24–27]. Folate availability is critical for DNA integrity, required for the transfer of methyl groups in the biosynthesis of thymidilate. In this study we tried to find out whether MTHFR variants and MTR polymorphism play a protective role in a childhood ALL.

The decrease in activity of MTHFR could affect the nucleotide synthesis by increasing availability of the 5, 10-methylene–THF which is required for DNA synthesis and cell division. Folate distribution decreases the transmethylation capacity and thereby decreasing S-adenosylmethionine / S-adenosylhomocysteine ratio and methylation of homocysteine to methionine. Diminished folate availability increases the probability of mis-incorporation of uracil in DNA strand at the time of replication and subsequently increasing the frequency of chromosomal breakage in human leukocyte [28–31].

A hematological malignancy like ALL is more vulnerable to DNA and chromosomal damage because folate deficiency in them cannot accomplish the demand of hasty DNA synthesis in uncontrolled and rapidly proliferating hematopoitic cells. DNA hypomethylation and uracil misincorporation are considered important factors in carcinogenesis [32, 11].

Several groups have reported that the polymorphisms which reduce the MTHFR activity were associated with the reduced risk of leukemia and lymphoma [10, 33, 34]. ALL patients with polymorphisms in serine hydroxymethyl transferase gene and thymidylate synthase genes are considered as low risk group [15, 35]. ALL cases with a polymorphisms in MTR 2756A→G genotype) showed reduction by 5.6-fold in adult ALL risk [35]. Not only MTR 2756A→G variants were considered as a risk allele for ALL but also in combination with the MTHFR variants [14].

In this study, attempts were made to evaluate the associations between the MTHFR 677C→T, MTHFR 1298AC and MTR 2756A→G polymorphisms and the risk of ALL in the 125 cases of the childhood ALL in north India compared with the sex and age matched controls. It has been reported that both MTHFR polymorphisms reduce the susceptibility to adult and childhood lymphoid leukemia however not in myeloid leukemia [10, 34, 36–38].

The significant protective effect of MTHFR 677CT variant but not MTHFR 1298A→C in the Brazilian population to decrease the risk of childhood ALL has been reported by de Franchis et al. [13]. Recently, Sood et al. [34] demonstrated the significant protective effect of MTHFR 677CT variant but not MTHFR 1298A→C in the north Indian population to decrease the risk of childhood ALL. Wiemels et al. [33] reported the protective effect of MTHFR 677C→T polymorphism on the risk for infant leukemia in the UK population but not for MTHFR 1298AC polymorphism; also it was demonstrated that 677C/T frequency was higher in ALL patients with MLL rearrangements, low in ALL with hyper-diploidy indicating that impact of 677C/T variant on development and progression of leukemia might vary between different subtype of ALL [37]. Matsuo et al. [21] provided the evidence which MTHFR mutant alleles are associated with lower susceptibility to ALL. Some other studies also reconfirmed that both MTHFR polymorphisms decreased the risk for childhood ALL in French–Canadian population [5]. The recent report by Reddy et al. [39] suggested a possible protective effect of MTHFR (677C→T) and MTHFR 1298A→C) for the first time they reported gender-bias protective effect of 677CT /1298AA and 677CT/1298AC toward of female ALL patients. Yeoh et al. [40] 2010 demonstrated association between MTHFR 1298AC and increasing the risk of ALL among male patients.

However, other research groups reported no association between MTHFR polymorphisms and the risk for childhood ALL, from different ethnic groups [13, 15, 21]. Wang et al. [41] in their recent meta-analysis reported albeit MTHFR C677T was found previously to be associated with increased risks of colorectal cancer, leukemia, and gastric cancer, but on the bases of this meta–analysis, they could not find evidence for a main role of MTHFR C677T in the leukemogesis of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

In the present study, significant difference between patients and healthy controls was not found, but also our result did not show the significant reduction in the risk of ALL and increasing the tolerance induced by T and C alleles in position of 677 and 1298 of MTHFR gene, respectively, in ALL patients in north Indian population.

We tried to analyze the influence of each polymorphism of MTHFR and MTR individually and in combination and their effect on the risk for childhood ALL. We could not observe significant associations between the genetic polymorphisms of the folate metabolizing enzymes and MTR on the risk for childhood ALL in our population of study.

However, the contradictory results were observed in association of genetic polymorphisms in the folate metabolic pathway with the risk for adult ALL [33, 35, 36, 40, 42]. Also, Gemmati et al. [36] and Lincz et al. [43] observed that MTR 2756AG polymorphism reduced the risk for adult ALL and lymphoma. On the other hand, Skibola et al. [35] and Matsuo et al. [21] reported on increased risk for different types of adult lymphoma in carriers for at least one G allele in locus 2756 of MTR gene. No association has been observed between MTR 2756A→G polymorphism and the risk for adult ALL according to [35, 42]. Our work also showed no association between MTR 2756A→G polymorphism and the risk of childhood ALL. The inconsistencies of results might be attributed to some variables in study of population like size of sampling, age and nutritional folic acid in diet. Rosenberg et al. [44] showed that the adequate folic acid consumption in a population may increase the frequency of the MTHFR 677T allele, in contrast insufficient level of folate in diet may results in decreasing the T allele frequency. This can justify the different frequency of MTHFR allele in population of this study as compared with Reddy et al. [39] may be influenced by different level of folic acid in diet of different ethnic groups in India. Thus the polymorphism of these genes did not show any effect on ALL susceptibility, so it could be interpreted that other molecular mechanisms like hypermethylation mediated gene silencing may play an important role in etiology of ALL in north Indian population. The mechanism proposed to explain these associations was the shunt of folate metabolism versus thymidine and purine synthesis, which could reduce the possibility of the incorporation of uracil into DNA and protect against carcinogenesis. It has been proposed that shunt of folate metabolism encounters the synthesis of thymidine and purine, reduces misincorpration of uracil into DNA and protect from any damage which lead to arising cancer [10, 39].

In conclusion, the present study provided the evidence that MTHFR (677 C→T), MTHFR (1298 A→C) and MTR (2576A→C) are not associated with decreased risk of childhood ALL and did not show significant effect on progression and development of childhood ALL. In the other words, we found that MTHFR 677CT and 1298AC may could not be considered as a crucial and probable marker for ALL development and progression and also could not be used for treatment strategies for childhood ALL, as epigene­tic mechanisms are more important in progression of childhood ALL. The larger studies, which in turn will be able to provide support to truly significant finding through much larger combined and comparative data sets, are necessary in this regard.


We are indebted to all patients and their parents who consented to participate in this study. This work was supported by University Grand Commission (UGC) India.


1. Pui CH, Relling MV, Downing JR. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1535–48.
2. Lichtman M, Beutler E, Kaushansky K, Kipps T, Seligsohn U, Prchal J. William’s Hematology. 7th Edition. McGraw-Hill: 2005.
3. Sinnett D, Krajinovic M, Labuda D. Genetic susceptibility to childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 2000; 38: 447–62.
4. Young-In K. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms, folate, and cancer risk: a paradigm of gene-nutrient interactions in carcinogenesis. Nutrition Rev 2009; 58:  205–09.
5. Wagner C. Biochemical role of folate in cellular metabolism. In: Folate in Health and Disease. Bailey L.B. eds. Marcel Dekker. New York1995: 23–42.
6. Miller JW, Nadeau MR, Smith J, et al. Folate deficiency-induced homocysteinemia in rats: disruption of S-adenosylmethionine coordinate regulation of homocysteine metabolism. Biochem J 1994; 298: 415–9.
7. Ryan BM, Weir DG. Relevance of folate metabolism in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. J Lab Clin Med 2001; 138: 164–76.
8. Duthie SJ, Narayanan S, Brand GM, et al. Impact of folate deficiency on DNA stability. J Nutr 2002; 132: 2444–9.
9. Lucock M. Is folic acid the ultimate functional food component for disease prevention? BMJ 2004; 328: 211–4.
10. Skibola CF, Smith MT, Kane L, et al. Polymorphisms in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene are associated with susceptibility to acute leukemia in adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 12810–5.
11. Dianov GL, Timchenko TV, Sinitsina OI, et al. Repair of uracil residues closely spaced on the opposite strands of plasmid DNA results in double-strand break and deletion formation. Mol Gen Genet 1991; 225: 448–52.
12. Goyette P, Summers JS, Milos R, et al. Human methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase: isolation of cDNA mapping and mutation identification. Nat Genet 1994; 7: 195–200.
13. de Franchis R, Sebastio G, Mandato C, et al. Spina bifida. 677T–>C mutation, and role of folate. Lancet 1995; 346: 1703.
14. Frosst P, Blom HJ, Milos R, et al. A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Nat Genet 1995; 10: 111–3.
15. Botto N, Andreassi MG, Manfredi S, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in folate and homocysteine metabolism as risk factors for DNA damage. Eur J Hum Genet 2003; 11: 671–8.
16. Lightfoot TJ, Skibola CF, Willett EV, et al. Risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma associated with polymorphisms in folate-metabolizing genes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14: 2999–3003.
17. van der Put NMJ, Gabreels F, Stevens EMB, et al. A second common mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene: an additional risk factor for neural-tube defects? Am J Hum Genet 1998; 26: 1044–51.
18. Bagley PJ, Selhub J. A common mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene is associated with an accumulation of formylated tetrahydrofolates in red blood cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 13217–20.
19. Etienne MC, Ilc K, Formento JL, et al. Thymidylate synthase and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms: relationships with 5-fluorouracil sensitivity. Br J Cancer 2004; 90: 526–34.
20. Leclerc D, Campeau E, Goyette P, et al. Human methionine synthase: cDNA cloning and identification of mutations in patients of the cbIG complementation group of folate/cobalamin disorders. Hum Mol Genet 1996; 5: 1867–74.
21. Matsuo K, Suzuki R, Hamajima N, et al. Association between polymorphisms of folateand methionine-metabolizing enzymes and susceptibility to malignant lymphoma. Blood 2001; 97: 3205–9.
22. Kim YI. Folate and carcinogenesis: evidence, mechanisms, and implications. J Nutr Biochem 1999; 10: 66–88.
23. Robien K, Ulrich CM. 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms and leukemia risk: a huge minireview. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157: 571–82.
24. Giovannucci E. Epidemiologic studies of folate and colorectal neoplasia: a review. J Nutr 2002; 132: 2350S–5.
25. Kim YI. Folate and cancer prevention: a new medical application of folate beyond hyperhomocysteinemia and neural tube defects. Nutr Rev 1999; 57: 314–21.
26. Ma J, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci E, et al. Methyl-enetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism, dietary interactions, and risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1997; 57: 1098–102.
27. Pogribny IP, Muskhelishvili L, Miller BJ, James SJ. Presence and consequence of uracil in preneoplastic DNA from folate/methyl-deficient rats. Carcinogenesis 1997; 18: 2071–7.
28. Bagley PJ, Selhub J. A common mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene is associated with an accumulation of formylated tetrahydrofolates in red blood cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 13217–20.
29. Brattstrom L, Wilcken DE, Ohrvik J, Brudin L. Common methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene mutation leads to hyperhomocysteinemia but not to vascular disease: the result of a meta-analysis. Circulation 1998; 98: 2520–6.
30. Friso S, Choi SW, Girelli D, et al. A common mutation in the 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene affects genomic DNA methylation through an interaction with folate status. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 5606–11.
31. Bagley PJ, Selhub J. A common mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene is associated with an accumulation of formylated tetrahydrofolates in red blood cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 13217–20.
32. Blount BC, Mack MM, Wehr CM, et al. Folate deficiency causes uracil misincorporation into human DNA and chromosome breakage: implications for cancer and neuronal damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 3290–5.
33. Wiemels JL, Smith RN, Taylor GM, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms and risk of molecularly defined subtypes of childhood acute leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 4004–9.
34. Sood S, Das R, Trehan A, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms: association with risk for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia in north Indians. Leukemia Lymphoma 2010; 51: 928–32.
35. Skibola CF, Smith MT, Hubbard A, et al. Polymorphisms in the thymidylate synthase and serine hydroxymethyltransferase genes and risk of adult acute lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 2002; 99: 3786–91.
36. Gemmati D, Ongaro A, Scapoli GL, et al. Common gene polymorphisms in the metabolic folate and methylation pathway and the risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in adults. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004; 13: 787–94.
37. Krajinovic M, Lamothe S, Labuda D, et al. Role of MTHFR genetic polymorphisms in the susceptibi­lity to childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2003; 103: 252–7.
38. de Jonge R, Tissing WJ, Hooijberg JH, et al. Polymorphisms in folate-related genes and risk of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2009; 113: 2284–9.
39. Reddy H, Jamil K. Polymorphisms in the MTHFR gene and their possible association with susceptibility to childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia in an Indian population. Leuk Lymphoma 2006; 47: 1333–9.
40. Yeoh AE, Lu Y, Chan JY, et al. Genetic susceptibility to childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia shows protection in Malay boys: results from the Malaysia-Singapore ALL Study Group. Leuk Res 2010; 34: 276–83.
41. Wang J, Zhan P, Chen B, et al. MTHFR C677T polymorphisms and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a meta-analysis. Leukemia Res 2010; 34: 1596–600.
42. Kamel AM, Moussa HS, Ebid GT, et al. Synergistic effect of methyltetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), C677T and A1298C polymorphism as risk modifiers of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Egypt Nat Cancer Inst 2007: 19: 96–105.
43. Lincz LF, Scorgie FE, Kerridge I, et al. Methionine synthase genetic polymorphism MS A2756G alters susceptibility to follicular but not diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2003; 120: 1051–4.
44. Rosenberg N, Murata M, Ikeda Y, et al. The Frequent 5, 10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase C6677T Polymorphism is Associated with a Common Haplotype in Whites, Japanese and Africans. Am J Hum. Genet. 2002; 70( 3): 758–762.

No Comments » Add comments
Leave a comment

ERROR: si-captcha.php plugin says GD image support not detected in PHP!

Contact your web host and ask them why GD image support is not enabled for PHP.

ERROR: si-captcha.php plugin says imagepng function not detected in PHP!

Contact your web host and ask them why imagepng function is not enabled for PHP.