ABO blood group and the risk of lung cancer in Greek adults: a case — control study
Summary. Aim: The present study aimed to investigate any possible association between ABO blood groups and lung cancer. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 122 lung cancer patients and 1,255 matched-healthy individuals that were reviewed retrospectively. Chi-square and logistic regression models were used for statistical analysis. Results: No significant difference between lung cancer patients and the control group was recorded regarding ABO blood types and the risk of lung cancer (p = 0.055, OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.61–1.03). Male gender (p = 0.006, OR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.24–3.49) and smoking (p = 0.000, OR = 3.13, 95% CI 1.72–5.69) were significantly associated with the risk of lung cancer. Conclusion: No association between ABO blood types and the risk of lung cancer was observed.
Submitted: March 19, 2018.
*Correspondence: E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Abbreviation used: LC — lung cancer.
Lung cancer (LC) consists the main cause of cancer deaths worldwide and is the second most common type of cancer in both genders . Main risk factors for LC development are smoking, exposure to environmental and workplace carcinogens, genetic factors such as advanced age, male gender, enzymes polymorphism and inherited conditions, ionizing radiation and previous lung disorders such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, tuberculosis, lung fibrosis and other unknown factors [2, 3].
The ABO blood groups system was discovered decades ago  and its antigens consist biochemical indices that are expressed in several cell types including erythrocytes, gastrointestinal cells, lung epithelial cells, mucosa cells etc. . Previous reports have recorded that the ABO blood group was associated with several disorders and pathological conditions, including coronary heart disease , ischemic stroke  and several types of cancer [8, 9], including LC . However, the data on the role of ABO blood group factor in LC is limited and inconsistent as such investigations were limited by their retrospective design and small case numbers [2, 11–14].
Patients and Methods
122 LC patients and 1,255 healthy individuals were assessed retrospectively. ABO blood groups distributions were similar to those for other Greek population. Individuals that were suffered from advanced LC under any form of treatment, from cancer in several locations in which smoking is considered as an obvious risk factor such as pharyngeal or larynx cancer, with lung metastases because of another primary cancer in a different location and those that were diagnosed by head-neck-thorax cancer-carcinogenesis field theory  — were excluded in order to avoid as much as possible potential confounding effects on the parameters examined. The LC patients were diagnosed by histological examination whereas the controls were selected by the friendly environment of the LC patients in an attempt to control possible potential confounders such as the socioeconomic and educational level. The following variables: age, gender, smoking status (active, former/never), socioeconomic (income/monthly ≥ 1,000 €), educational level (graduated from University/College), history of previous pulmonary diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and LC family history, for the participants were estimated, whereas both groups were filled in a self-administered questionnaire that included information regarding the mentioned aspects and data regarding their general medical history with reference to medication and several chronic systemic diseases. For each individual the mentioned variables were evaluated and coded as dichotomous variables. Chi-square and multivariate logistic regression model was carried out to investigate the possible associations. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio’s (OR’s) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were also assessed. SPSS ver. 17.0. statistical package was used for the analysis and a p value of p < 0.05 was determined as significant statistically.
Results and Discussion
The study sample included 680 males and 697 females ranging in age from 45 to 70+ years old and mean age 67 ± 4 years. The distribution of LC patients with their histological subtype and the ABO group were for squamous LC: A blood group — 42.8%, B — 18.4%, AB —10.3%, O — 28.5%, for adenocarcinoma: A blood group — 32.3%, B — 11.8%, AB — 8.8%, O — 47.1%, for small cell LC: A blood group — 52.0%, B — 8.0%, AB — 8.0%, O — 32.0% and for other subtype: A blood group — 35.7%, B — 7.1%, AB — 14.3%, O — 42.9%. According to univariate analysis the variables age (p = 0.000), educational level (p = 0.002, OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.38–0.80) and smoking (p = 0.000, OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.26–0.61) were found to be significantly associated with LC risk.
The primary model showed that smoking (p = 0.000, OR = 3.19, 95% CI 1.75–5.84) and male gender (p = 0.013, OR = 1.95, 95% CI 1.15–3.29) were significantly associated with LC risk whereas ABO blood type was not (p = 0.076, OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.60–1.00). According to the final model, smoking (p = 0.000, OR = 3.13, 95% CI 1.72–5.69) and male gender (p = 0.006, OR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.24–3.49) were significantly associated with LC risk, whereas no significant association between ABO blood type and LC risk was observed (p = 0.055, OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.61–1.03). In the current study we investigated the possible association between ABO blood group system and the risk of LC development. Except for the known etiological and risk factors that are associated with LC development, no association was observed between those that were examined. Recent and previous reports have recorded the impact of the ABO blood types in the development of several types of cancer, including LC  in which it was found that blood type other than O was associated with the risk of LC, whereas in another study  no significant association was recorded.
The current study has some limitations. First, the study as a retrospective one, has some known weaknesses compared to prospective ones, such as systemic biases that concerns the sample selection and the small number of the cases, and the presence of possible confounders. However, further prospective studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms by which ABO blood type may influence the LC risk. In conclusion, it was recorded that ABO blood type was not associated with increased LC risk.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors have no conﬂict of interests to declare.
1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69–90.
No Comments » Add comments