Comparison of chromosomal rearrangements in bone marrow cells and blast transformed B-cells in relapse of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma

Andreieva S.V.*1, Korets K.V.2, Ruzhinska O.E.2, Skorokhod I.M.2, Alkhimova O.G.3

Summary. Aim: The genetic mechanisms of resistance to chemotherapy in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (B-CLL/SLL) are not clear. We aimed to determine the peculiarities of abnormal karyotype formation in bone marrow (BM) cells and peripheral blood (PB) blast transformed B-cells in relapse of B-CLL/SLL. Materials and Methods: Cytogenetic GTG banding technique and molecular cytogenetic in interphase cells (i-FISH) studies of BM cells and PB blast transformed B-lymphocytes were performed in 14 patients (10 males and 4 females) with B-CLL/SLL. Results: The results of karyotyping BM and PB cells revealed the heterogeneity of cytogenetic abnormalities in combined single nosological group of B-CLL/SLL. In PB B-cells, chromosome abnormalities related to a poor prognosis group were registered 2.5 times more often than in BM cells. Additional near tetraploid clones that occurred in 57.1% cases were the peculiar feature of BM cell karyotypes. Chromosomal rearrangements characteristic of the group of adverse cytogenetic prognosis were revealed in all cases from which in 2 cases by karyotyping BM cells, in 6 cases in PB B-cells and in 8 cases by the i-FISH method in BM cells, i.e. their detection frequency was 3 times higher in PB B-cells and 4 times higher when analyzing by i-FISH in BM cells. Conclusions: Mismatch in abnormal karyotypes in BM and PB B-cells by the presence of quantitative and structural chromosomal rearrangements may be indicative of simultaneous and independent processes of abnormal clone formation in the lymph nodes and BM hematopoietic cells. Accumulation the information about previously unidentified chromosomal rearrangements in relapse of the disease may help to understand the ways of resistance formation to chemotherapy.

Submitted: April 27, 2017.
Correspondence: Fax: +38 (044) 4402722
E-mail:office@immd.kiev.ua
Abbreviations used: B-CLL — B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia; BM — bone marrow; FISH — fluorescence in situ hybridization; i-FISH — interphase nuclei fluorescence in situ hybridization; PB — peripheral blood; SLL — small lymphocytic lymphoma.

B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) is the most common type of leukemia among the population of Europe and North America countries, and makes up approximately 30.0% of all neoplasia of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. In Ukraine today, about 11,000 people are diagnosed and registered with CLL. The WHO classification of tumors of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues (2016) combines B-CLL with small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) considered as a single nosology form [1]. Cytomorphological identity characteristics, immunophenotype and the results of molecular genetic analysis serves as a basis for such unified B-CLL/SLL entity. Both diseases have a clonal origin from B-cells while in SLL, substrate cells are not detected in the peripheral blood (PB) [2]. In B-CLL, primary genetic rearrangements may occur in B-cells of bone marrow (BM). Further repeated antigenic stimulation leads to the accumulation of additional genetic rearrangements resulting in leukemia development. Evaluation of genetic abnormalities, in particular cytogenetic, conducted at diagnosis, is necessary for better understanding of the biological characteristics of the tumor and the prognosis, being advantageous for the stratification of patients in clinical risk groups [3].

Recently, for evaluation of genetic rearrangements, the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of interphase nuclei FISH (i-FISH) has been commonly used, i.e. analysis of chromosomal rearrangements is carried out in non-dividing cells. However, this method has limitations since only those genome regions are identified for which FISH probes are available.

Comparison of chromosomal abnormalities with the disease peculiarities and the response to chemotherapy allowed distinguishing between three groups of cytogenetic prognosis. To the group with favorable prognosis, the patients with cytogenetically normal karyotype and del(13q) detectable by i-FISH are included. The group with adverse prognosis includes the patients who have been registered for following changes: del(11q) with the loss of ATM gene and del(17p) with the loss of a tumor suppressor gene TP53. Malignant cells, which carry these abnorma­lities, are characterized by resistance to conventional chemotherapy with purine analogs and alkylating agents. In addition, the patients with del(6)(q21-23) are included in this group. Trisomy 12 as well as the abnormalities not listed in the previous two groups constitute a group of intermediate prognosis [4–6].

The complexity of standard cytogenetic study of metaphase chromosomes in BM cells by G-banding is associated with low proliferative activity of substrate cells and their accumulation in G0/G1 phase of cell cycle. For obtaining a population of dividing cells, the stimulation by B-cell mitogens such as pokeweed mitogen (PWM), 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA), lipopolysaccharides are traditionally used. However, the frequency of abnormal clones in such blast transformed B-lymphocytes makes up only 40–50% [7–9]. To improve the effectiveness of cytogenetic studies, the attempts were made to use other stimulators of the cell cycle. Among the new mitogens, the CpG-oligodeoxynucleotide DSP30 (CpG-ODN) [10] is used. Thus, detection of chromosomal abnormalities increases to 80% of cases. Moreover, the rearrangements have been registered that had not been described previously.

Therefore, we aimed to determine the patterns of abnormal karyotypes in BM cells and PB blast transformed B-lymphocytes in relapse of B-CLL/SLL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients. Cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic studies of BM cells and blast transformed B-lymphocytes were performed in 14 patients (10 males and 4 females) with B-CLL/SLL. The average age in the group was 53.3 years (range 40 to 65 years). The leukocyte count in patients examined was recorded within 7.4–78.4•109/l, hemoglobin — 121.0–155.0 g/l, thrombocytes — 106.0–294.0•109/l, the lymphocyte count in PB ranged from 69.0 to 98.0%. The patients gave written informed consent for the publication of their data analyses.

Cytogenetic studies. Metaphase chromosome of BM cells were prepared according to the conventional method [11] after 24 h culture in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum followed by G-bands staining (GTG technique). Metaphase chromosomes of PB blast transformed B-lymphocytes were prepared after 72 h of culture in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 3.6 mg/ml gentamicin and CpG-ODN mitogen at a final concentration of 2.5 µg/ml [12].

Identified chromosomal abnormalities were described according to the International nomenclature of human chromosomes ISCN 2013 [13]. Only clonal chromosomal abnormalities were taken into account in the study. The karyotype was considered as normal when no less than 20 analyzed and 10 karyotyped metaphase plates showed no chromosomal abnormalities.

i-FISH was performed after 24-h or 72-h culture. For this purpose, two sets were used: Vysis LSI p53 (locus specific probe for TP53 gene detection located in the disk 17р13.1), LSI ATM (probe for registration ATM gene located in the disk 11q22.3) and LSI D13S319 (disc 13q14), LSI 13q34, CEP12 (centromeric region of chromosome 12) (Abbott, USA). The error of method was 8.0%.

RESULTS ANS DISCUSSION

The results of BM cells and PB blast transformed B-lymphocytes karyotyping were divided into three groups according to the clone structure. For all cases, in parallel, the molecular cytogenetic studies were carried out in i-FISH (Table). A distinctive feature of a half of BM cell karyotypes was the presence of additional near tetraploid clone (50%) (No. 1–3, 8–11). Formation of abnormal clones both in BM (Fig. 1) and PB (Fig. 2) was due to quantitative (monosomy, trisomy, marker chromosomes) and structural chromosomal rearrangements (deletions, translocations, derivative chromosomes).

Table. Comparison of results of cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic studies of BM cells and PB blast transformed B-lymphocytes in relapse of B-CLL
Group Method Bone marrow cells B-lymphocytes of peripheral blood
Group 1 GTG 1 46,XY[22]/4n±[3] 46,XY,del(6)(q16)[20]
i-FISH nuc ish(ATM,p53)x2[200],(D13S319,13q34,CEP12)x2[300]
GTG 2 46,XY[17]/4n±[3] 46,XY,t(2;18)(p24;q12),del(11)(q13)[20]
i-FISH nuc ish(ATMx1)[78/100], (p53x1)[26/100],(D13S319,13q34,CEP12)x2[300]
GTG 3 46,XY[23]/4n±[2] 46,XY,del(13)(q12q14)[10]/46,XY[10]
i-FISH nuc ish(ATMx2)[100],(p53x1)[16/100],(D13S319x1)[25/100],(13q34,CEP12)x2[200]
GTG 4 46,XY[20] 46,XY,-8,+12,der(14)[9]/46,XY[11]
i-FISH nuc ish(ATM,p53)x2[200],(D13S319,13q34)x2[200],(CEP12x1,CEP12dimx1)[90/100]
Group 2 GTG 5 46,XX,del(13)(q12q14)[8]/46,XX[16] 46,XX[20]
i-FISH nuc ish(ATM,p53)x2[200],(D13S319x1)[24/100],(13q34,CEP12)x2[200]
GTG 6 46,XY, del(13)(q12q14)[14]/46,XY[10] 46,XY[20]
i-FISH nuc ish(ATMx2)[100],(p53x1)[13/100],(D13S319x1)[73/100],(13q34,CEP12)x2[200]
GTG 7 47,XY,+21[7]/46,XY,+t(10;16)(q25;q13),-der(16)t(10;16)(q25;q13)[2]/4n±[3]/46,XY[11] 46,XY[20]
i-FISH nuc ish(ATMx2)[100],(p53x1)[13/100],(D13S319,13q34,CEP12)x2[300]
GTG 8 46,XX,del(13)(q12q14)[5]/4n±[3]/46,XX[12] 46,XX[20]
i-FISH nuc ish(ATMx2)[100],(p53x1)[10/100],(D13S319,13q34,CEP12)x2[300]
GTG 9 45,XY,t(20;17)(q13.?;p11)[2]/4n±[4]/46,XY[24] 46,XY[20]
i-FISH nuc ish(ATM,p53)x2[200],(D13S319,13q34,CEP12)x2[300]
Group 3 GTG 10 46,XX,del(17)(p12)[3]/4n±[3]/46,XX[14] 46,XX,del(17)(p12)[7]/46,XX[13]
i-FISH nuc ish(ATMx2)[100],(p53x1)[84/100],(D13S319x1)[39/100],(13q34x1)[15/100],(CEP12x2)[100]
GTG 11 46,XX,der(2),del(11)(p13q23)[11]/4n±[2]/46,XX[7] 46,XX,der(2),del(11)(p13q23)[20]
i-FISH nuc ish(ATMx1)[92/100],(p53x1)[10/100],(D13S319,13q34,CEP12)x2[300]
GTG 12 47,XY,+12[6]/46,XY[14] 49,XY,+12,+18,+19[20]
i-FISH nuc ish(ATM,p53)x2[100],(D13S319x1)[40/100],(13q34x2)[100],(CEP12x3)[43/100]
GTG 13 47,XY,+20[2]/46,XY[8] 46~47,XY,+del(6)(q24)[3]/46,XY[2]
i-FISH nuc ish(ATMx1)[42/100],(p53x1)[34/100],(D13S319x1)[28/100],(13q34x1)[10/100],(CEP12x2)[100]
GTG 14 45,X,-Y[4]/46,XY,der(13)[3]/46,XY[18] 46,XY,dup(3)(q21q26),del(11)(q23),del(13)(q14)[20]
i-FISH nuc ish(ATMx1)[43/100],(p53x1)[15/100],(D13S319x1)[35/100],(13q34,CEP12)x2[200]
Note: GTG – karyotyping by GTG banding technique; і-FISH – molecular cytogenetic assay
235235 Comparison of chromosomal rearrangements in bone marrow cells and blast transformed B cells in relapse of B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma
Fig. 1. Structural chromosomal rearrangements of BM cells in relapse of B-CLL/SLL
222324 Comparison of chromosomal rearrangements in bone marrow cells and blast transformed B cells in relapse of B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma
Fig. 2. Structural chromosomal rearrangements of PB blast transformed cells in relapse of B-CLL/SLL

Four cases were related to the first group, where normal (N) (No. 4) and the mosaic karyotypes (normal and near teraploid clones — N/4n±) (No. 1–3) were registered in BM cells. In addition, microdeletions of ATM genes, TP53 (No. 2) and 13q14, TP53 (No. 3) were identified in this group by i-FISH method that was confirmed by karyotyping PB cells of these patients, namely: del(11)(q13) (No. 2) and del(13)(q12q14) (No. 3). At the same time, in PB B-cells, the karyotypes were represented by the pseudodiploid clones formed as a result of deletions — del(6)(q16) (№ 1), del(11)(q13) (No. 2), del(13)(q12q14) (No. 3), the pre­sence of the derivative chromosome 14 (No. 4), and unba­lanced quantitative abnormalities — monosomy 8 and trisomy 12 (No. 4). In 2 cases (No. 3, 4) in PB, the mosaic karyotype was registered, wherein the se­cond clone was represented by cytogenetically normal karyotype, possibly due to the presence of normal lymphocytes. Interesting results were obtained in cases No. 1 and 4. On the one hand, the study of BM showed the cytogenetically normal karyotype and absence of deletion in the regions carrying the tumor suppressor genes. On the other hand, the presence of chromosomal abnormalities in PB in these patients may indicate the origin of these abnormal clones outside the BM and is likely to evidence in favor of SLL with the leukemization.

In the second group, the reverse situation was observed, namely, a normal karyotype was revealed in B-cells of PB while in BM cells almost all abnormal clones were pseudodiploid. Thus, in 3 cases the abnormal clone was formed by an unbalanced structural rearrangement, the interstitial deletion del(13)(q12q14) (No. 5, 6, 8); in 2 other cases, trisomy 21 and unbalanced translocation, t(10;16)(q25;q13) (No. 7) and t(20;17)(q13;p11.?) (No. 9) were detected. The absence of abnormal karyotypes in B-cells of PB and their presence in BM cells may indicate that the BM is the source of the abnormal clone formation.

In the third group, the clonal abnormalities were revealed both in BM cells and B-cells of PB. Thus, in the first two cases, the abnormal clones in BM as well as in PB consisted of identical structural chromosomal rearrangements: del(17)(p12) (No. 10) and der(2), del(11)(p13q23) (No. 11). In all cases, the mosaic karyotype with presence of cytogenetically normal clone was observed in BM cells, while in PB the presence of cytogenetically normal clone was detected only in 2 cases out of 5 (No. 10, 13), which may indicate the relative safety of the cellular pool of BM hematopoietic cells in the patients. In the case No. 12, the BM cells and PB B-cells shared the trisomy of chromosome 12, which is typical for B-CLL, and is re­gistered with the karyotyping in 10–15% cases, and in 30% — by FISH [14]. However, in cases No. 12–14, the numerical and structural clonal abnormalities in BM and PB did not coincide. Such diversity appears to be due to the existence of additional mechanisms for the formation of the populations of malignant cells in B-CLL/SLL also taking into account the role of microenvironmental factors.

In general, the chromosomal abnormalities in BM cells in a group with an adverse cytogenetic prognosis were detected in 2 cases by karyotyping (No. 10, 11) and in 9 cases using i-FISH (No. 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 and 14), two of which were identified in the cytogenetically normal karyotypes. Abnorma­lities related to the group of a favorable prognosis were detected in 7 cases (No. 1–6, 8) on karyotyping results, wherein results of FISH for 4 patients (No. 2, 3, 6, 8) ranked to a group of poor prognosis mainly due to the presence of del(17). 8 patients (No. 5–9, 12–14) after karyotyping were assigned to the group of intermediate prognosis, 5 of them being in the group of poor prognosis according to the results of FISH analysis (No. 6, 7, 8, 13, 14).

In PB B-cells, abnormalities ranked to a poor prognosis group by karyotyping results were reported in 6 cases (No. 1, 2, 10, 11, 13, 14). The group attri­buted to the favorable cytogenetical prognosis included 6 cases (No. 3, 5–9). The chromosomal aberrations belonging to the group of intermediate prognosis (No. 4, 12) were revealed in 2 cases.

Thus, the results of karyotyping BM and PB cells revealed the heterogeneity of cytogenetic abnorma­lities in a single nosological group B-CLL/SLL. Based on karyotyping, in PB B-cells chromosome abnorma­lities related to a poor prognosis group were registered 2.5 times more often than in BM cells. However, results of FISH analysis in BM cells allowed us to increase the number of patients with a poor prognosis that occurs mainly due to the presence of del(11) and del(17), i.e. associated with a loss of tumor suppressor genes [15–20].

Therefore, the results of karyotyping have shown heterogeneity of cytogenetic abnormalities by karyotype structure, ploidy, numerical and structural chromosome rearrangements in a single nosological group of B-CLL/SLL. Additional near-tetraploid clones that occurred in 57.1% cases were the peculiar feature of the BM cell karyotypes. Chromosomal rearrangements characteristic of the group of adverse cytogenetic prognosis were revealed in all cases from which 2 cases — by karyotyping of BM cells, 6 — in PB B-cells and 8 — by the i-FISH method in BM cells, i.e. their detection frequency was 3 times higher in PB B-cells and 4 times higher when analyzing by i-FISH in BM cells. These findings suggest that all three methods should be used for full information concerning the genetic rearrangements both in BM cells and B-cells in B-CLL/SLL. Ambiguous are the findings of the normal karyotype in B-cells of PB while karyotype in BM cells was abnormal. Accumulation of the information about previously unidentified chromosomal rearrangements in relapse of the disease may help to understand the ways of resistance formation to chemotherapy. Mismatch in abnormal karyotypes in BM and PB B-cells by the presence of quantitative and structural chromosomal rearrangements may be indicative of simultaneous and independent processes of abnormal clone formation in the lymph nodes and BM hematopoietic cells.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Prof. Danylo Gluzman, R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology of the NAS of Ukraine, for the confirmation of diagnosis and stage of the disease.

REFERENCES

No Comments » Add comments
Leave a comment

ERROR: si-captcha.php plugin says GD image support not detected in PHP!

Contact your web host and ask them why GD image support is not enabled for PHP.

ERROR: si-captcha.php plugin says imagepng function not detected in PHP!

Contact your web host and ask them why imagepng function is not enabled for PHP.